Back to Search Start Over

The mini-Bentall approach: Comparison with full sternotomy

Authors :
Vishal N. Shah
Maxwell Kilcoyne
Meghan Buckley
Serge Sicouri
Konstadinos A. Plestis
Source :
JTCVS Techniques
Publication Year :
2021
Publisher :
Elsevier BV, 2021.

Abstract

Background The upper mini sternotomy Bentall (mini-Bentall) procedure may result in less trauma and earlier recovery compared with the full sternotomy Bentall procedure (full Bentall). This study compares immediate and 1- and 3-year survival rates after mini- and full Bentall procedures. Methods Between February 2009 and July 2019, 48 patients underwent a mini-Bentall and 49 underwent a full Bentall. Patients who required concomitant procedures, reoperations, or hypothermic circulatory arrest were excluded from our analysis. The mean patient age was 60.7 years in the mini-Bentall group and 59.0 years in the full Bentall group. Results There were no in-hospital mortalities. The median cardiopulmonary bypass time (mini-Bentall: 165 minutes [interquartile range (IQR), 155.5-183 minutes]; full Bentall: 164 minutes [IQR, 150-187 minutes]; P = .619) and aortic cross-clamp times (139 minutes [IQR, 128.5-153 minutes] vs 137 minutes [IQR, 125-156 minutes]; P = .948) were not significantly different between the 2 groups. The mini-Bentall group had a significantly shorter median ventilation time compared with the full Bentall group (5.5 hours [IQR, 3-14 hours] vs 17 hours [IQR, 11-23 hours]; P

Details

ISSN :
26662507
Volume :
7
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
JTCVS Techniques
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....7d41b793df3d5f4c4a5cf6473b964b9a
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xjtc.2021.01.025