Back to Search Start Over

Clinical Efficacy of Novel Patient-Covering Negative-Pressure Box for Shielding Virus Transmission during Esophagogastroduodenoscopy: A Prospective Observational Study

Authors :
Haruo Oba
Toshio Uchida
Tingting Shi
Naoya Tada
Taichi Nagatomi
Noriko Nishiyama
Taiga Chiyo
Nobuya Kobayashi
Tatsuo Yachida
Takanori Matsui
Tsutomu Masaki
Kazuhiro Kozuka
Shintaro Fujihara
Hideki Kobara
Source :
Diagnostics, Volume 11, Issue 9, Diagnostics, Vol 11, Iss 1679, p 1679 (2021)
Publication Year :
2021
Publisher :
Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute, 2021.

Abstract

Esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) has a high risk of virus transmission during the current coronavirus disease 2019 era, and preventive measures are under investigation. We investigated the effectiveness of a newly developed patient-covering negative-pressure box system (Endo barrier®) (EB) for EGD. Eighty consecutive unsedated patients who underwent screening EGD with EB use were prospectively enrolled. To examine the aerosol ratio before, during, and after EGD, 0.3- and 0.5-μm aerosols were measured every 60 s using an optical counter. Moreover, the degree of contamination of the examiners’ goggles and vinyl gowns was assessed before and after EGD using a rapid adenosine triphosphate (ATP) test for simulated droplets. Data were available in 73 patients and showed that 0.3- and 0.5-μm particles did not increase in 95.8% (70/73) and 94.5% (69/73) of patients during EGD under EB. There were no significant differences in the total 0.3- or 0.5-μm particle counts before versus after EGD. The difference in the ATP levels before and after EGD was −0.6 ± 16.6 relative light units (RLU) on goggles and 1.59 ± 19.9 RLU on gowns (both within the cutoff value). EB use during EGD may provide a certain preventive effect against aerosols and droplets, decreasing examiners’ exposure to viruses.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
20754418
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Diagnostics
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....7d063ad269ad1dde1494569c93ae0f91
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11091679