Back to Search Start Over

QOLP-30. SURVIVAL, LOCAL CONTROL, AND HEALTH RELATED QUALITY OF LIFE IN OLIGOMETASTATIC AND POLYMETASTATIC SPINAL TUMORS: A MULTICENTER, INTERNATIONAL STUDY

Authors :
Peter Pal Varga
Anne L. Versteeg
Yoshiya Yamada
Ori Barzilai
Mark H. Bilsky
Michael Webber
Paul M. Arnold
Daniel M. Sciubba
Ilya Laufer
Chetan Bettegowda
Michelle J. Clarke
Michael G. Fehlings
Laurence D. Rhines
Charles G. Fisher
Arjun Sahgal
Ziya L. Gokaslan
Stefano Boriani
James M. Schuster
Source :
Neuro-Oncology. 20:vi221-vi221
Publication Year :
2018
Publisher :
Oxford University Press (OUP), 2018.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Oligometastatic disease (5 metastases) is considered an intermediate cancer state of limited metastatic capacity and improved prognosis. Hence, in recent years, treatment of oligometastatic spinal disease has trended towards more definitive, ablative therapies. Little is known about the actual prognosis of patients presenting with oligometastatic spinal disease. The focus of this study was to compare oligometastatic spine patients to those with polymetastatic disease (>5 metastases). METHODS: This is an international, multicenter analysis of prospectively collected data. Data collected included demographics, survival, local control, histology, number and location of spine metastases, epidural spine cord compression (ESCC), the Spinal Instability Neoplastic Score (SINS), systemic disease burden, and treatment details. Health-related quality of life (HrQOL) measures included; numeric rating scale (NRS) for pain, EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D-3L), short form 36 version 2 (SF-36v2) and the spine oncology study group outcomes questionnaire (SOSGOQ). RESULTS: A total of 393 patients were included, of which 215 presented with oligometastatic disease and 178 with polymetastatic disease. A significant survival advantage was found for patients presenting with oligometastatic disease compared to those with polymetastatic disease at time of initial treatment of spinal metastases. This survival advantage was noticeable in both operative and non-operative patients. Local control rates were higher in the oligometastatic group for the spinal level treated. Furthermore, both groups experienced significant improvement in multiple HrQOL measures at 6 months post-treatment with no differences in these outcome measures between the two groups. CONCLUSION: At time of treatment of spinal metastatic disease, oligometastatic disease offers a significant survival advantage compared to polymetastatic disease, regardless of treatment choice. Local control can be achieved in both groups. HrQOL measures improve in both groups post-treatment, thus demonstrating a palliative treatment benefit for all treated patients. Our results support the oligometastatic theory and the current trend of ablative treatment for oligometastatic spine disease.

Details

ISSN :
15235866 and 15228517
Volume :
20
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Neuro-Oncology
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....7c56ee76089b525cc76a1440ff4a144f