Back to Search Start Over

Representation theorems and the semantics of decision-theoretic concepts

Authors :
Brian Hill
Mikaël Cozic
Lettres, Idées, Savoir (LIS)
Université Paris-Est Créteil Val-de-Marne - Paris 12 (UPEC UP12)
Institut d'Histoire et de Philosophie des Sciences et des Techniques (IHPST)
Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (UP1)-Département d'Etudes Cognitives - ENS Paris (DEC)
École normale supérieure - Paris (ENS Paris)
Université Paris sciences et lettres (PSL)-Université Paris sciences et lettres (PSL)-École normale supérieure - Paris (ENS Paris)
Université Paris sciences et lettres (PSL)-Université Paris sciences et lettres (PSL)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)
Lettres Idées Savoirs, Ea 4395
École normale supérieure - Paris (ENS-PSL)
Université Paris sciences et lettres (PSL)-Université Paris sciences et lettres (PSL)-École normale supérieure - Paris (ENS-PSL)
Source :
Journal of Economic Methodology, Journal of Economic Methodology, Taylor & Francis (Routledge), 2015, 22 (3), pp.292-311
Publication Year :
2015
Publisher :
HAL CCSD, 2015.

Abstract

Contemporary decision theory places crucial emphasis on a family of mathematical results called representation theorems, which relate criteria for evaluating the available options (such as the expected utility criterion) to axioms pertaining to the decision-maker’s preferences (for example, the transitivity axiom). Various claims have been made concerning the reasons for the importance of these results. The goal of this article is to assess their semantic role: representation theorems are purported to provide definitions of the decision-theoretic concepts involved in the evaluation criteria (such as those of utility or subjective probability that feature in the subjective expected utility criterion). In particular, this claim shall be examined from the perspective of philosophical theories of the meaning of theoretical terms.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1350178X and 14699427
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Journal of Economic Methodology, Journal of Economic Methodology, Taylor & Francis (Routledge), 2015, 22 (3), pp.292-311
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....7c27b9f6e691e078a56f5c9c9e03cfe4