Back to Search
Start Over
Fueling factionalism?
- Source :
- Journal of Conflict Resolution, 65(4), 788-812. SAGE Publications
- Publication Year :
- 2020
-
Abstract
- First published online: 14 September 2020 While peace processes increase the likelihood that a civil war is resolved, they can also complicate peace by increasing the risk of rebel fragmentation. In this article, we argue that negotiations exacerbate pre-existing structural and substantial divisions within rebel organizations, therefore increasing the likelihood of a rebel split. More specifically, we put forward a theoretical framework that specifies why factions within a rebel group may disagree with the onset of negotiations, the conclusion of a peace agreement, or the implementation of an agreement-and thus break away during the peace process. We empirically assess the merit of this framework by systematically comparing the impact of these phases in a peace process on the fragmentation of rebel organizations. Using data that more accurately reflect the moment a rebel split takes place than earlier studies, we find that peace processes have a greater substantial impact on rebel fragmentation than previously assumed.
- Subjects :
- 021110 strategic, defence & security studies
Sociology and Political Science
media_common.quotation_subject
05 social sciences
0211 other engineering and technologies
02 engineering and technology
Fragmentation (weaponry)
General Business, Management and Accounting
0506 political science
Negotiation
Spanish Civil War
Political science
Political economy
Political Science and International Relations
Mediation
050602 political science & public administration
media_common
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- Journal of Conflict Resolution, 65(4), 788-812. SAGE Publications
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....7ba67f68bd5e902bf57bbe5de94ae837