Back to Search
Start Over
Anthropometry and Esophageal Cancer Risk in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition
- Source :
- Steffen, A, Schulze, M B, Pischon, T, Dietrich, T, Molina, E, Chirlaque, M-D, Barricarte, A, Amiano, P, Quirós, J R, Tumino, R, Mattiello, A, Palli, D, Vineis, P, Agnoli, C, Misirli, G, Boffetta, P, Kaaks, R, Rohrmann, S, Bueno-de-Mesquita, H B, Peeters, P H M, May, A M, Spencer, E A, Allen, N E, Bingham, S, Tjønneland, A, Halkjær, J, Overvad, K, Stegger, J, Manjer, J, Lindkvist, B, Hallmanns, G, Stenling, R, Lund, E, Riboli, E, Gonzalez, C A & Boeing, H 2009, ' Anthropometry and Esophageal Cancer Risk in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition ', Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, vol. 18, no. 7, pp. 2079-2089 . https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-09-0265
- Publication Year :
- 2009
- Publisher :
- American Association for Cancer Research (AACR), 2009.
-
Abstract
- Background: Increasing evidence suggests that general obesity [measured by body mass index (BMI)] is positively associated with risk of esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC). In contrast, previous studies have shown inverse relations with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). However, it is still unclear whether body fat distribution, particularly abdominal obesity, is associated with each type of esophageal cancer.Methods: We applied multivariable adjusted Cox proportional hazards regression to investigate the association between anthropometric measures and risk of EAC and ESCC among 346,554 men and women participating in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition. All statistical tests were two sided.Results: During 8.9 years of follow-up, we documented 88 incident cases of EAC and 110 cases of ESCC. BMI, waist circumference, and waist-to-hip ratio (WHR) were positively associated with EAC risk [highest versus lowest quintile; relative risk (RR), 2.60; 95% confidence interval (95% CI), 1.23-5.51; Ptrend < 0.01; RR, 3.07; 95% CI, 1.35-6.98; Ptrend < 0.003; and RR, 2.12; 95% CI, 0.98-4.57; Ptrend < 0.004]. In contrast, BMI and waist circumference were inversely related to ESCC risk, whereas WHR showed no association with ESCC. In stratified analyses, BMI and waist circumference were significantly inversely related to ESCC only among smokers but not among nonsmokers. However, when controlled for BMI, we found positive associations for waist circumference and WHR with ESCC, and these associations were observed among smokers and nonsmokers.Conclusion: General and abdominal obesity were associated with higher EAC risk. Further, our study suggests that particularly an abdominal body fat distribution might also be a risk factor for ESCC. (Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2009;18(7):2079–89)
- Subjects :
- Adult
Male
Risk
medicine.medical_specialty
Waist
Esophageal Neoplasms
Epidemiology
Adenocarcinoma
Gastroenterology
Body Mass Index
Surveys and Questionnaires
Internal medicine
medicine
Humans
Anthropometry esophageal cancer risk European prospective investigation cancer nutrition
Obesity
Prospective Studies
Risk factor
Life Style
Abdominal obesity
Aged
Proportional Hazards Models
Anthropometry
Waist-Hip Ratio
business.industry
nutritional and metabolic diseases
Feeding Behavior
Middle Aged
Confidence interval
Surgery
European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition
Europe
Oncology
Relative risk
Body Composition
Carcinoma, Squamous Cell
Female
medicine.symptom
business
Body mass index
Follow-Up Studies
Subjects
Details
- ISSN :
- 15387755 and 10559965
- Volume :
- 18
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....7a5a43c2e8a53bedeaa780810ad0d7e6