Percutaneous AXillary Artery (PAXA) Access at the First Segment During Fenestrated and Branched Endovascular Aortic Procedures

Objective The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility and safety of percutaneous axillary access with vessel closure device closure after puncturing the first segment during endovascular treatment of complex aneurysms with fenestrated and branched endografts (F/BEVAR). Methods The PAXA (Percutaneous AXillary Access) study is a physician initiated, single centre, ambispective, non-randomised study ( clinicaltrials.gov : NCT03223311 ). The primary endpoint was the closure success rate defined as the absence of any vascular injury to achieve haemostasis at the puncture site, requiring any treatment other than manual compression or adjunctive endovascular ballooning. The secondary endpoints were minor access complications, cerebrovascular complication rate, short term access vessel patency, and study cohort anatomical evaluation of the axillary artery. Results Sixty-four patients required an upper extremity access during F/BEVAR procedure during study period (November 2016 to July 2019) and were screened for the PAXA study: 59 patients (47 males; median age: 75 years, IQR 69–78) met the study inclusion criteria and were enrolled (one patient had bilateral access). Closure success was obtained in 54 cases (90%) with no open conversion required: five patients received a bare or covered stenting to the AXA and in one patient mechanical failure of the delivery system was recorded. No 30 day permanent peripheral nerve injuries and two non-ipsilateral ischaemic strokes (3.4%) were recorded. Seven patients (12%) had access haematomas managed conservatively associated with closure failure (p = .002), oral anticoagulants therapy (p = .005) and procedure length (p = .028). At short term follow up (6 months), no late complications were observed, and all access vessels were patent. Conclusion PAXA on the first segment using a large sheath (10–16F) is technically feasible, relatively safe with no need for open conversion but it may require access related secondary endovascular procedures. Further prospective studies are needed to modify the device instruction for use and to put the procedure on label.