Back to Search Start Over

Comparison of assisted reproductive technology outcomes in infertile women with polycystic ovary syndrome:In vitromaturation, GnRH agonist, and GnRH antagonist cycles

Authors :
Sun-Hee Lee
In Ok Song
Chan Woo Park
Inn Soo Kang
Min Hye Choi
Jin Young Kim
Hye Ok Kim
Mi Kyoung Koong
Kwang Moon Yang
Sun Hwa Cha
Source :
Clinical and Experimental Reproductive Medicine
Publication Year :
2012
Publisher :
The Korean Society for Reproductive Medicine, 2012.

Abstract

Objective We compared the assisted reproductive technology (ART) outcomes among infertile women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) treated with IVM, conventional IVF, GnRH agonist, and GnRH antagonist cycles. Methods The prospective study included a total of 67 cycles in 61 infertile women with PCOS. The women with PCOS were randomized into three IVF protocols: IVM/IVF with FSH and hCG priming with immature oocyte retrieval 38 hours later (group A, 14 cycles), GnRH agonist long protocol (group B, 14 cycles), and GnRH antagonist multi-dose flexible protocol (group C, 39 cycles). IVF outcomes, such as clinical pregnancy rate (CPR), implantation rate (IR), miscarriage rate (MR), and live birth rate (LBR), were compared among the three groups. Results Age, BMI, and basal FSH and LH levels did not differ among the three groups. The number of retrieved oocytes and 2 pronucleus embryos was significantly lower in group A compared with groups B and C. The CPR, IR, MR, and LBR per embryo transfer showed no differences among the three groups. There was no incidence of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome in group A. Conclusion The IR, MR, and LBR in the IVM cycles were comparable to those of the GnRH agonist and GnRH antagonist cycles. The IVM protocol, FSH and hCG priming with oocyte retrieval 38 hours later, is an effective ART option that is comparable with conventional IVF for infertile women with PCOS.

Details

ISSN :
22338241 and 22338233
Volume :
39
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Clinical and Experimental Reproductive Medicine
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....794820e0db84e6df98e245729e2a30fa
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.5653/cerm.2012.39.4.166