Back to Search Start Over

Precision and Accuracy of Oxygen Flow Meters Used at Hospital Settings

Authors :
Luciano C. Torres
José Roberto Jardim
Oliver A. Nascimento
Josy Davidson
Claudia Gazzeta
Source :
Respiratory Care. 57:1071-1075
Publication Year :
2012
Publisher :
Daedalus Enterprises, 2012.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Oxygen therapy is an important therapeutic resource for patients with hypoxemia. When changing oxygen flow meters, we have observed that sometimes, even with the same oxygen flow setting as before, a different SpO2 is obtained. OBJECTIVE: To analyze the precision and accuracy of flow meters used in hospital settings. METHODS: An experimental study was performed to test oxygen flow meters from a tertiary hospital, by using a calibrated flow analyzer. Used and new flow meter accuracy was tested by reading in the gas analyzer a single measurement at flow rates of 1, 3, 5, and 10 L/min in 91 flow meters, and they were compared using the Student t test or Mann-Whitney U test. Flow meter precision was tested by reading in the flow analyzer 3 repetitive measurements set at flow rates of 1, 3, 5, and 10 L/min in 11 flow meters, and the reproducibility of these measurements was conducted by using the intraclass correlation coefficient and the Friedman test. RESULTS: The mean measured flow rates were slightly lower than the stipulated flow rate at 1 L/min, very close for 3 L/min, and higher for the 5 and 10 L/min flow rates. There was a large variability among the measurements from different flow meters, mainly at low flow rates (1 and 3 L/min). There was no difference between new and used flow meters at the flow rates measured, except at 10 L/min. Flow meters precision analysis showed a good reproducibility in 3 repetitive measurements for each flow rate (minimum 0.95, maximum 0.99 intraclass correlations). CONCLUSIONS: The flow meters tested showed good precision and poor accuracy.

Details

ISSN :
19433654 and 00201324
Volume :
57
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Respiratory Care
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....792eb1844476c412b6939d7347787436
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.4187/respcare.01230