Back to Search Start Over

Four artemisinin-based treatments in African pregnant women with malaria

Authors :
Jean-Pierre Van Geertruyden
Prosper Gbekor
Joyce Mulenga
Modest Mulenga
Joris Menten
Umberto D'Alessandro
Maminata Traoré-Coulibaly
Michael Nambozi
Harry Tagbor
Theonest K. Mutabingwa
Divine Pekyi
Marc Christian Tahita
Innocent Valea
Céline Schurmans
Kamala Thriemer
Gertrude Kalanda
Victor Mwapasa
Yves Claeys
Raffaella Ravinetto
Akua A. Ampromfi
Linda Kalilani-Phiri
Jean-Bertin Bukasa Kabuya
Maaike De Crop
Chantal Van Overmeir
Sebastian Hachizovu
Halidou Tinto
Gifty Antwi
Mwayiwawo Madanitsa
PREGACT Study Grp
PREGACT Study Group
Source :
The New England journal of medicine, Malawi medical journal
Publication Year :
2016
Publisher :
The Medical Association Of Malawi, 2016.

Abstract

BACKGROUND Information regarding the safety and efficacy of artemisinin combination treatments for malaria in pregnant women is limited, particularly among women who live in sub-Saharan Africa. METHODS We conducted a multicenter, randomized, open-label trial of treatments for malaria in pregnant women in four African countries. A total of 3428 pregnant women in the second or third trimester who had falciparum malaria (at any parasite density and regardless of symptoms) were treated with artemether-lumefantrine, amodiaquine-artesunate, mefloquine-artesunate, or dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine. The primary end points were the polymerase-chain-reaction (PCR)-adjusted cure rates (i.e., cure of the original infection; new infections during follow-up were not considered to be treatment failures) at day 63 and safety outcomes. RESULTS The PCR-adjusted cure rates in the per-protocol analysis were 94.8% in the artemether-lumefantrine group, 98.5% in the amodiaquine-artesunate group, 99.2% in the dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine group, and 96.8% in the mefloquine-artesunate group; the PCR-adjusted cure rates in the intention-to-treat analysis were 94.2%, 96.9%, 98.0%, and 95.5%, respectively. There was no significant difference among the amodiaquine-artesunate group, dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine group, and the mefloquine-artesunate group. The cure rate in the artemether-lumefantrine group was significantly lower than that in the other three groups, although the absolute difference was within the 5-percentage-point margin for equivalence. The unadjusted cure rates, used as a measure of the post-treatment prophylactic effect, were significantly lower in the artemether-lumefantrine group (52.5%) than in groups that received amodiaquine-artesunate (82.3%), dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine (86.9%), or mefloquine-artesunate (73.8%). No significant difference in the rate of serious adverse events and in birth outcomes was found among the treatment groups. Drug-related adverse events such as asthenia, poor appetite, dizziness, nausea, and vomiting occurred significantly more frequently in the mefloquine-artesunate group (50.6%) and the amodiaquine-artesunate group (48.5%) than in the dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine group (20.6%) and the artemether-lumefantrine group (11.5%) (P

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
00284793 and 19957262
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
The New England journal of medicine, Malawi medical journal
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....78552dd87b1a9a77fd3b414b0d04290d