Back to Search Start Over

Characterizing the Potency and Impact of Carbon Ion Therapy in a Primary Mouse Model of Soft Tissue Sarcoma

Authors :
Katherine D. Castle
Peter Guida
Yvonne M. Mowery
Chang-Lung Lee
Amy J. Wisdom
David G. Kirsch
Lorraine Da Silva Campos
Marco Durante
Yan Ma
Jeremy Brownstein
Junheng Gao
Nerissa Williams
Sin-Ho Jung
Chiara La Tessa
Lixia Luo
Emanuele Scifoni
Francesco Tommasino
Brownstein, Jeremy Michael
Wisdom, Amy Jordan
Castle, Katherine D
Mowery, Yvonne M
Guida, Peter M
Lee, Chang-Lung
Tommasino, Francesco
La Tessa, Chiara
Scifoni, Emanuele
Gao, Junheng
Luo, Lixia
Da Silva Campos, Lorraine
Ma, Yan
Williams, Nerissa
Jung, Sin-Ho
Durante, Marco
Kirsch, David G
Source :
Molecular Cancer Therapeutics. 17:858-868
Publication Year :
2018
Publisher :
American Association for Cancer Research (AACR), 2018.

Abstract

Carbon ion therapy (CIT) offers several potential advantages for treating cancers compared with X-ray and proton radiotherapy, including increased biological efficacy and more conformal dosimetry. However, CIT potency has not been characterized in primary tumor animal models. Here, we calculate the relative biological effectiveness (RBE) of carbon ions compared with X-rays in an autochthonous mouse model of soft tissue sarcoma. We used Cre/loxP technology to generate primary sarcomas in KrasLSL-G12D/+; p53fl/fl mice. Primary tumors were irradiated with a single fraction of carbon ions (10 Gy), X-rays (20 Gy, 25 Gy, or 30 Gy), or observed as controls. The RBE was calculated by determining the dose of X-rays that resulted in similar time to posttreatment tumor volume quintupling and exponential growth rate as 10 Gy carbon ions. The median tumor volume quintupling time and exponential growth rate of sarcomas treated with 10 Gy carbon ions and 30 Gy X-rays were similar: 27.3 and 28.1 days and 0.060 and 0.059 mm3/day, respectively. Tumors treated with lower doses of X-rays had faster regrowth. Thus, the RBE of carbon ions in this primary tumor model is 3. When isoeffective treatments of carbon ions and X-rays were compared, we observed significant differences in tumor growth kinetics, proliferative indices, and immune infiltrates. We found that carbon ions were three times as potent as X-rays in this aggressive tumor model and identified unanticipated differences in radiation response that may have clinical implications. Mol Cancer Ther; 17(4); 858–68. ©2018 AACR.

Details

ISSN :
15388514 and 15357163
Volume :
17
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....77bec2f81843ca0f9e415d86793edda7