Back to Search Start Over

Can mammographic assessments lead to consider density as a risk factor for breast cancer?

Authors :
Violaine Prince
P.J. Valette
C. Colin
Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud [CHU - HCL] (CHLS)
Hospices Civils de Lyon (HCL)
Exploration et exploitation de données textuelles (TEXTE)
Laboratoire d'Informatique de Robotique et de Microélectronique de Montpellier (LIRMM)
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Université de Montpellier (UM)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Université de Montpellier (UM)
Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud [CHU - HCL] ( CHLS )
Hospices Civils de Lyon ( HCL )
Exploration et exploitation de données textuelles ( TEXTE )
Laboratoire d'Informatique de Robotique et de Microélectronique de Montpellier ( LIRMM )
Université de Montpellier ( UM ) -Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique ( CNRS ) -Université de Montpellier ( UM ) -Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique ( CNRS )
Source :
European Journal of Radiology, European Journal of Radiology, Elsevier, 2013, 82, pp.404-411. ⟨10.1016/j.ejrad.2010.01.001⟩, www.elsevier.com/locate/ejrad, European Journal of Radiology, Elsevier, 2013, 82, pp.404-411. 〈www.elsevier.com/locate/ejrad〉. 〈10.1016/j.ejrad.2010.01.001〉
Publication Year :
2013
Publisher :
Elsevier BV, 2013.

Abstract

International audience; Admitting that mammographic breast density is an important independent risk factor for breast cancer in the general population, has a crucial economical health care impact, since it might lead to increasing screening frequency or reinforcing additional modalities. Thus, the impact of density as a risk factor has to be carefully investigated and might be debated. Some authors suggested that high density would be either a weak factor or confused with a masking effect. Others concluded that most of the studies have methodological biases in basic physics to quantify percentage of breast density, as well as in mammo- graphic acquisition parameters. The purpose of this review is to evaluate mammographic procedures and density assessments in published studies regarding density as a breast cancer risk. No standardiza- tion was found in breast density assessments and compared density categories. High density definitions varied widely from 25 to 75% of dense tissues on mammograms. Some studies showed an insufficient follow-up to reveal masking effect related to mammographic false negatives. Evaluating breast density impact needs thorough studies with consensual mammographic procedures, methods of density mea- surement, breast density classification as well as a standardized definition of high breast density. Digital mammography, more effective in dense breasts, should help to re-evaluate the issue of density as a risk factor for breast cancer.

Details

ISSN :
0720048X
Volume :
82
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
European Journal of Radiology
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....776e793a37629c6daa2c7f1858c27b14
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2010.01.001