Back to Search Start Over

Altered rPrP substrate structures and their influence on real-time quaking induced conversion reactions

Authors :
Joe D. O'Neil
J. David Knox
Brooks Waitt
Debra Godal
Sharon L.R. Simon
Michael Carpenter
Angela Sloan
Keding Cheng
Gary Mallinson
Dave Jackson
Jane Eastlake
Robert Vendramelli
Source :
Protein Expression and Purification. 143:20-27
Publication Year :
2018
Publisher :
Elsevier BV, 2018.

Abstract

Background Bacterially-produced recombinant prion protein (rPrP) has traditionally been used for in vitro fibrillation assays and reagent development for prion disease research. In recent years, it has also been used as a substrate for real-time quaking-induced conversion (RT-QuIC), a very sensitive method of detecting the presence of the misfolded, disease-associated isoform of the prion protein (PrP d ). Multi-centre trials have demonstrated that RT-QuIC is a suitably reliable and robust technique for clinical practice; however, in the absence of a commercial supplier of rPrP as a substrate for RT-QuIC, laboratories have been required to independently generate this key component of the assay. No harmonized method for producing the protein has been agreed upon, in part due to the variety of substrates that have been applied in RT-QuIC. Methods This study examines the effects of two different rPrP refolding protocols on the production, QuIC performance, and structure characteristics of two constructs of rPrP commonly used in QuIC: full length hamster and a sheep-hamster chimeric rPrP. Results Under the described conditions, the best performing substrate was the chimeric sheep-hamster rPrP produced by shorter guanidine-HCl exposure and faster gradient elution. Conclusions The observation that different rPrP production protocols influence QuIC performance indicates that caution should be exercised when comparing inter-laboratory QuIC results.

Details

ISSN :
10465928
Volume :
143
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Protein Expression and Purification
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....776a7e209cfdef990a7b638f87604d8f
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pep.2017.10.007