Back to Search
Start Over
Seeing double with K2: Testing re-inflation with two remarkably similar planets around red giant branch stars
- Source :
- Grunblatt, S K, Huber, D, Gaidos, E, Lopez, E D, Howard, A W, Isaacson, H T, Sinukoff, E, Vanderburg, A, Nofi, L, Yu, J, North, T S H, Chaplin, W, Foreman-Mackey, D, Petigura, E, Ansdell, M, Weiss, L, Fulton, B & Lin, D N C 2017, ' Seeing Double with K2 : Testing re-inflation with two remarkably similar planets around red giant branch stars ', Astronomical Journal, vol. 154, no. 6, 254 . https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-3881/aa932d
- Publication Year :
- 2017
-
Abstract
- Despite more than 20 years since the discovery of the first gas giant planet with an anomalously large radius, the mechanism for planet inflation remains unknown. Here, we report the discovery of EPIC228754001.01, an inflated gas giant planet found with the NASA K2 Mission, and a revised mass for another inflated planet, K2-97b. These planets reside on ~9 day orbits around host stars which recently evolved into red giants. We constrain the irradiation history of these planets using models constrained by asteroseismology and Keck/HIRES spectroscopy and radial velocity measurements. We measure planet radii of 1.31 +\- 0.11 Rjup and and 1.30 +\- 0.07 Rjup, respectively. These radii are typical for planets receiving the current irradiation, but not the former, zero age main sequence irradiation of these planets. This suggests that the current sizes of these planets are directly correlated to their current irradiation. Our precise constraints of the masses and radii of the stars and planets in these systems allow us to constrain the planetary heating efficiency of both systems as 0.03% +0.03%/-0.02%. These results are consistent with a planet re-inflation scenario, but suggest the efficiency of planet re-inflation may be lower than previously theorized. Finally, we discuss the agreement within 10% of stellar masses and radii, and planet masses, radii, and orbital periods of both systems and speculate that this may be due to selection bias in searching for planets around evolved stars.<br />18 pages, 15 figures, accepted to AJ. Figures 11, 12, and 13 are the key figures of the paper
- Subjects :
- fundamental parameters - stars
010504 meteorology & atmospheric sciences
Gas giant
FOS: Physical sciences
01 natural sciences
Asteroseismology
Planet
0103 physical sciences
detection - planets and satellites
physical evolution - stars
010303 astronomy & astrophysics
Astrophysics::Galaxy Astrophysics
0105 earth and related environmental sciences
Physics
Inflation (cosmology)
Earth and Planetary Astrophysics (astro-ph.EP)
planet-star interactions - planets and satellites
Astronomy
Astronomy and Astrophysics
Radius
gaseous planets - planets and satellites
Radial velocity
Red-giant branch
Stars
13. Climate action
Space and Planetary Science
oscillations
Astrophysics::Earth and Planetary Astrophysics
Astrophysics - Earth and Planetary Astrophysics
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- Grunblatt, S K, Huber, D, Gaidos, E, Lopez, E D, Howard, A W, Isaacson, H T, Sinukoff, E, Vanderburg, A, Nofi, L, Yu, J, North, T S H, Chaplin, W, Foreman-Mackey, D, Petigura, E, Ansdell, M, Weiss, L, Fulton, B & Lin, D N C 2017, ' Seeing Double with K2 : Testing re-inflation with two remarkably similar planets around red giant branch stars ', Astronomical Journal, vol. 154, no. 6, 254 . https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-3881/aa932d
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....77350dc5fc57f7ec62ecccbbbff0d39b
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-3881/aa932d