Back to Search Start Over

Structured reporting of x-ray mammography in the first diagnosis of breast cancer: a Delphi consensus proposal

Authors :
Emanuele Neri
Vincenza Granata
Stefania Montemezzi
Paolo Belli
Daniela Bernardi
Beniamino Brancato
Francesca Caumo
Massimo Calabrese
Francesca Coppola
Elsa Cossu
Lorenzo Faggioni
Alfonso Frigerio
Roberta Fusco
Antonella Petrillo
Veronica Girardi
Chiara Iacconi
Carolina Marini
Maria Adele Marino
Laura Martincich
Jacopo Nori
Federica Pediconi
Gianni Saguatti
Mario Sansone
Francesco Sardanelli
Gianfranco Paride Scaperrotta
Chiara Zuiani
Eleonora Ciaghi
Marco Montella
Vittorio Miele
Roberto Grassi
Neri, Emanuele
Granata, Vincenza
Montemezzi, Stefania
Belli, Paolo
Bernardi, Daniela
Brancato, Beniamino
Caumo, Francesca
Calabrese, Massimo
Coppola, Francesca
Cossu, Elsa
Faggioni, Lorenzo
Frigerio, Alfonso
Fusco, Roberta
Petrillo, Antonella
Girardi, Veronica
Iacconi, Chiara
Marini, Carolina
Marino, Maria Adele
Martincich, Laura
Nori, Jacopo
Pediconi, Federica
Saguatti, Gianni
Sansone, Mario
Sardanelli, Francesco
Scaperrotta, Gianfranco Paride
Zuiani, Chiara
Ciaghi, Eleonora
Montella, Marco
Miele, Vittorio
Grassi, Roberto
Source :
La Radiologia medica. 127(5)
Publication Year :
2022

Abstract

Background Radiology is an essential tool in the management of a patient. The aim of this manuscript was to build structured report (SR) Mammography based in Breast Cancer. Methods A working team of 16 experts (group A) was composed to create a SR for Mammography Breast Cancer. A further working group of 4 experts (group B), blinded to the activities of the group A, was composed to assess the quality and clinical usefulness of the SR final draft. Modified Delphi process was used to assess level of agreement for all report sections. Cronbach’s alpha (Cα) correlation coefficient was used to assess internal consistency and to measure quality analysis according to the average inter-item correlation. Results The final SR version was built by including n = 2 items in Personal Data, n = 4 items in Setting, n = 2 items in Comparison with previous breast examination, n = 19 items in Anamnesis and clinical context; n = 10 items in Technique; n = 1 item in Radiation dose; n = 5 items Parenchymal pattern; n = 28 items in Description of the finding; n = 12 items in Diagnostic categories and Report and n = 1 item in Conclusions. The overall mean score of the experts and the sum of score for structured report were 4.9 and 807 in the second round. The Cronbach’s alpha (Cα) correlation coefficient was 0.82 in the second round. About the quality evaluation, the overall mean score of the experts was 3.3. The Cronbach’s alpha (Cα) correlation coefficient was 0.90. Conclusions Structured reporting improves the quality, clarity and reproducibility of reports across departments, cities, countries and internationally and will assist patient management and improve breast health care and facilitate research.

Details

ISSN :
18266983
Volume :
127
Issue :
5
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
La Radiologia medica
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....771ca80ad848f9ede09d38c518254985