Back to Search Start Over

Dynamic Pressure Pain Hypersensitivity as Assessed by Roller Pressure Algometry in Episodic Cluster Headache

Authors :
David García-Azorín
César Fernández-de-las-Peñas
Víctor Gómez-Mayordomo
Lars Arendt-Nielsen
Nuria González-García
Ángel L Guerrero
María L. Cuadrado
María Palacios-Ceña
Source :
Web of Science, Scopus-Elsevier, Palacios-Cena, M, Gomez-Mayordomo, V, Garcia-Azorin, D, Gonzalez-Garcia, N, Cuadrado, M L, Fernandez-de-Las-Penas, C, Arendt-Nielsen, L & Guerrero, A L 2020, ' Dynamic Pressure Pain Hypersensitivity as Assessed by Roller Pressure Algometry in Episodic Cluster Headache ', Pain Physician, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 219-227 . < https://www.painphysicianjournal.com/current/pdf?article=NzA0Mg%3D%3D&journal=125 >, Aalborg University

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A method for assessing dynamic muscle hyperalgesia (dynamic pressure algometry) has been developed and applied in tension-type and migraine headaches.OBJECTIVES: To investigate differences in dynamic pressure pain assessment over the trigeminal area between men with cluster headache (CH) and headache-free controls, and the association between dynamic and static pressure pain sensitivity.STUDY DESIGN: A case-control study.SETTING: Tertiary urban hospital.METHODS: Forty men with episodic CH and 40 matched controls participated. Dynamic pressure pain sensitivity was assessed with a dynamic pressure algometry set consisting of 8 rollers with different fixed levels (500, 700, 850, 1,350, 1,550, 2,200, 3,850, and 5,300 g). Each roller was moved at a speed of 0.5 cm/sec over a diagonal line covering the temporalis muscle from an anterior to posterior direction. The dynamic pressure threshold (DPT; load level of the first painful roller) and the pain intensity perceived at the DPT level (roller-evoked pain) were assessed. Static pressure pain thresholds (PPT) were also assessed with a digital pressure algometer applied statically over the mid-muscle belly of the temporalis. Patients were assessed in a remission phase, at least 3 months from the last cluster attack, and without preventive medication.RESULTS: Side-to-side consistency between DPTs (r = 0.781, P &lt; 0.001), roller-evoked pain on DPT (r = 0.586; P &lt; 0.001), and PPTs (r = 0.874; P &lt; 0.001) were found in men with CH. DPT was moderately, bilaterally, and side-to-side associated with PPTs (0.663 &gt; r &gt; 0.793, all P &lt; 0.001). Men with CH had bilateral lower DPT and PPT and reported higher levels of roller-evoked pain (all P &lt; 0.001) than headache-free controls.LIMITATIONS: Only men with episodic CH were included.CONCLUSIONS: This study supports that a dynamic pressure algometry is as valid as a static pressure algometry for assessing pressure pain sensitivity in patients with CH. Assessing both dynamic and static pain sensitivity may provide new opportunities for differentiated diagnostics.KEY WORDS: Cluster headache, dynamic pressure pain, pressure pain threshold.

Details

Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Web of Science, Scopus-Elsevier, Palacios-Cena, M, Gomez-Mayordomo, V, Garcia-Azorin, D, Gonzalez-Garcia, N, Cuadrado, M L, Fernandez-de-Las-Penas, C, Arendt-Nielsen, L &amp; Guerrero, A L 2020, &#39; Dynamic Pressure Pain Hypersensitivity as Assessed by Roller Pressure Algometry in Episodic Cluster Headache &#39;, Pain Physician, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 219-227 . < https://www.painphysicianjournal.com/current/pdf?article=NzA0Mg%3D%3D&amp;journal=125 >, Aalborg University
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....76f39e7121cad9709a5965898fd5aaf5