Back to Search
Start Over
Dynamic Pressure Pain Hypersensitivity as Assessed by Roller Pressure Algometry in Episodic Cluster Headache
- Source :
- Web of Science, Scopus-Elsevier, Palacios-Cena, M, Gomez-Mayordomo, V, Garcia-Azorin, D, Gonzalez-Garcia, N, Cuadrado, M L, Fernandez-de-Las-Penas, C, Arendt-Nielsen, L & Guerrero, A L 2020, ' Dynamic Pressure Pain Hypersensitivity as Assessed by Roller Pressure Algometry in Episodic Cluster Headache ', Pain Physician, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 219-227 . < https://www.painphysicianjournal.com/current/pdf?article=NzA0Mg%3D%3D&journal=125 >, Aalborg University
-
Abstract
- BACKGROUND: A method for assessing dynamic muscle hyperalgesia (dynamic pressure algometry) has been developed and applied in tension-type and migraine headaches.OBJECTIVES: To investigate differences in dynamic pressure pain assessment over the trigeminal area between men with cluster headache (CH) and headache-free controls, and the association between dynamic and static pressure pain sensitivity.STUDY DESIGN: A case-control study.SETTING: Tertiary urban hospital.METHODS: Forty men with episodic CH and 40 matched controls participated. Dynamic pressure pain sensitivity was assessed with a dynamic pressure algometry set consisting of 8 rollers with different fixed levels (500, 700, 850, 1,350, 1,550, 2,200, 3,850, and 5,300 g). Each roller was moved at a speed of 0.5 cm/sec over a diagonal line covering the temporalis muscle from an anterior to posterior direction. The dynamic pressure threshold (DPT; load level of the first painful roller) and the pain intensity perceived at the DPT level (roller-evoked pain) were assessed. Static pressure pain thresholds (PPT) were also assessed with a digital pressure algometer applied statically over the mid-muscle belly of the temporalis. Patients were assessed in a remission phase, at least 3 months from the last cluster attack, and without preventive medication.RESULTS: Side-to-side consistency between DPTs (r = 0.781, P < 0.001), roller-evoked pain on DPT (r = 0.586; P < 0.001), and PPTs (r = 0.874; P < 0.001) were found in men with CH. DPT was moderately, bilaterally, and side-to-side associated with PPTs (0.663 > r > 0.793, all P < 0.001). Men with CH had bilateral lower DPT and PPT and reported higher levels of roller-evoked pain (all P < 0.001) than headache-free controls.LIMITATIONS: Only men with episodic CH were included.CONCLUSIONS: This study supports that a dynamic pressure algometry is as valid as a static pressure algometry for assessing pressure pain sensitivity in patients with CH. Assessing both dynamic and static pain sensitivity may provide new opportunities for differentiated diagnostics.KEY WORDS: Cluster headache, dynamic pressure pain, pressure pain threshold.
- Subjects :
- Adult
Male
Pain Threshold
medicine.medical_specialty
Cluster headache
Dynamic pressure pain
Pain
Cluster Headache
Temporal Muscle
Pressure algometry
Pain assessment
Pressure
Humans
Medicine
Pain Measurement
Pressure pain threshold
business.industry
Static pressure
Middle Aged
medicine.disease
Intensity (physics)
Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
Migraine
Hyperalgesia
Case-Control Studies
Physical therapy
Dynamic pressure
Headaches
medicine.symptom
business
Subjects
Details
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- Web of Science, Scopus-Elsevier, Palacios-Cena, M, Gomez-Mayordomo, V, Garcia-Azorin, D, Gonzalez-Garcia, N, Cuadrado, M L, Fernandez-de-Las-Penas, C, Arendt-Nielsen, L & Guerrero, A L 2020, ' Dynamic Pressure Pain Hypersensitivity as Assessed by Roller Pressure Algometry in Episodic Cluster Headache ', Pain Physician, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 219-227 . < https://www.painphysicianjournal.com/current/pdf?article=NzA0Mg%3D%3D&journal=125 >, Aalborg University
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....76f39e7121cad9709a5965898fd5aaf5