Back to Search Start Over

Benefits and Harms of Lung Cancer Screening by Chest Computed Tomography: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Authors :
Rocco Trisolini
Michela Cinquini
Antonio Passaro
Tindara Franchina
Jessica Menis
Umberto Malapelle
Francesco Facchinetti
Anna Rita Larici
Marzia Del Re
Sara Pilotto
Silvia Novello
Roberto Ferrara
Francesco Passiglia
Sara Ramella
Giulio Rossi
Luca Bertolaccini
Passiglia, F.
Cinquini, M.
Bertolaccini, L.
Del Re, M.
Facchinetti, F.
Ferrara, R.
Franchina, T.
Larici, A. R.
Malapelle, U.
Menis, J.
Passaro, A.
Pilotto, S.
Ramella, S.
Rossi, G.
Trisolini, R.
Novello, S.
Source :
Journal of Clinical Oncology. 39:2574-2585
Publication Year :
2021
Publisher :
American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), 2021.

Abstract

PURPOSE This meta-analysis aims to combine and analyze randomized clinical trials comparing computed tomography lung screening (CTLS) versus either no screening (NS) or chest x-ray (CXR) in subjects with cigarette smoking history, to provide a precise and reliable estimation of the benefits and harms associated with CTLS. MATERIALS AND METHODS Data from all published randomized trials comparing CTLS versus either NS or CXR in a highly tobacco-exposed population were collected, according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Subgroup analyses by comparator (NS or CXR) were performed. Pooled risk ratio (RR) and relative 95% CIs were calculated for dichotomous outcomes. The certainty of the evidence was assessed using the GRADE approach. RESULTS Nine eligible trials (88,497 patients) were included. Pooled analysis showed that CTLS is associated with: a significant reduction of lung cancer–related mortality (overall RR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.78 to 0.98; NS RR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.69 to 0.92); a significant increase of early-stage tumors diagnosis (overall RR, 2.84; 95% CI 1.76 to 4.58; NS RR, 3.33; 95% CI, 2.27 to 4.89; CXR RR, 1.52; 95% CI, 1.04 to 2.23); a significant decrease of late-stage tumors diagnosis (overall RR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.68 to 0.83; NS RR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.56 to 0.80); a significant increase of resectability rate (NS RR, 2.57; 95% CI, 1.76 to 3.74); a nonsignificant reduction of all-cause mortality (overall RR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.94 to 1.05); and a significant increase of overdiagnosis rate (NS, 38%; 95% CI, 14 to 63). The analysis of lung cancer–related mortality by sex revealed nonsignificant differences between men and women ( P = .21; I-squared = 33.6%). CONCLUSION Despite there still being uncertainty about overdiagnosis estimate, this meta-analysis suggested that the CTLS benefits outweigh harms, in subjects with cigarette smoking history, ultimately supporting the systematic implementation of lung cancer screening worldwide.

Details

ISSN :
15277755 and 0732183X
Volume :
39
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....76cbce9de181b6a0e67d8435ce275163