Back to Search
Start Over
Benefits and Harms of Lung Cancer Screening by Chest Computed Tomography: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
- Source :
- Journal of Clinical Oncology. 39:2574-2585
- Publication Year :
- 2021
- Publisher :
- American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), 2021.
-
Abstract
- PURPOSE This meta-analysis aims to combine and analyze randomized clinical trials comparing computed tomography lung screening (CTLS) versus either no screening (NS) or chest x-ray (CXR) in subjects with cigarette smoking history, to provide a precise and reliable estimation of the benefits and harms associated with CTLS. MATERIALS AND METHODS Data from all published randomized trials comparing CTLS versus either NS or CXR in a highly tobacco-exposed population were collected, according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Subgroup analyses by comparator (NS or CXR) were performed. Pooled risk ratio (RR) and relative 95% CIs were calculated for dichotomous outcomes. The certainty of the evidence was assessed using the GRADE approach. RESULTS Nine eligible trials (88,497 patients) were included. Pooled analysis showed that CTLS is associated with: a significant reduction of lung cancer–related mortality (overall RR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.78 to 0.98; NS RR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.69 to 0.92); a significant increase of early-stage tumors diagnosis (overall RR, 2.84; 95% CI 1.76 to 4.58; NS RR, 3.33; 95% CI, 2.27 to 4.89; CXR RR, 1.52; 95% CI, 1.04 to 2.23); a significant decrease of late-stage tumors diagnosis (overall RR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.68 to 0.83; NS RR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.56 to 0.80); a significant increase of resectability rate (NS RR, 2.57; 95% CI, 1.76 to 3.74); a nonsignificant reduction of all-cause mortality (overall RR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.94 to 1.05); and a significant increase of overdiagnosis rate (NS, 38%; 95% CI, 14 to 63). The analysis of lung cancer–related mortality by sex revealed nonsignificant differences between men and women ( P = .21; I-squared = 33.6%). CONCLUSION Despite there still being uncertainty about overdiagnosis estimate, this meta-analysis suggested that the CTLS benefits outweigh harms, in subjects with cigarette smoking history, ultimately supporting the systematic implementation of lung cancer screening worldwide.
- Subjects :
- Cancer Research
medicine.medical_specialty
Lung Neoplasms
MEDLINE
Computed tomography
Settore MED/10 - MALATTIE DELL'APPARATO RESPIRATORIO
law.invention
03 medical and health sciences
0302 clinical medicine
Randomized controlled trial
law
Early Detection of Cancer
Female
Humans
medicine
030212 general & internal medicine
Lung
medicine.diagnostic_test
business.industry
screening
computed tomography lung screening (CTLS)
lung cancer
medicine.anatomical_structure
Oncology
030220 oncology & carcinogenesis
Meta-analysis
Radiology
business
Lung cancer screening
Human
Subjects
Details
- ISSN :
- 15277755 and 0732183X
- Volume :
- 39
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....76cbce9de181b6a0e67d8435ce275163