Back to Search Start Over

Age-appropriate early school age neurobehavioral outcomes of extremely preterm birth without severe intraventricular hemorrhage: A single center experience

Authors :
Fern R. Litman
Kristine Erickson
Ida Sue Baron
Margot D. Ahronovich
Jennifer C. Gidley Larson
Source :
Early Human Development. 85:191-196
Publication Year :
2009
Publisher :
Elsevier BV, 2009.

Abstract

Extremely low birth weight (ELBW) is an established risk factor for poor neurocognitive outcome, particularly when severe intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) complicates the neonatal course. Those born26 weeks gestational age (GA) are at greatest risk, their outcomes poorer than later born ELBW children. Outcomes of GA subgroups of ELBW uncomplicated by severe IVH have not been well described.To compare neurocognitive and behavioral outcomes of those bornandor=26 weeks for an ELBW cohort treated in a single center with extremely low IVH incidence.Single center retrospective observational cohort study ofor=1000 g survivors born between 1998-2000, using standardized tests of cognition, academic achievement, executive function, attention, language, memory, motor/visual-motor skill, parent and teacher behavioral questionnaires.ELBW participants (mean age: 6.85+/-0.79) had a mean General Cognitive Ability of 101.4+/-13.05; no significant differences found between26 weeks (98.19+/-12.48) andor=26 weeks (102.97+/-13.21) subgroups. No neurocognitive, achievement, or behavioral score was impaired (or=2 SDs below the normative mean). Subgroup comparisons were nonsignificant after controlling for BW and maternal education, except foror=26 week advantage for phoneme analysis. Poorer, but low average, performances were found for motor dexterity/coordination, spatial working memory, and selective attention.Age-appropriate neurocognitive and behavioral function of ELBW survivors suggests outcome may be predicted based on IVH incidence as opposed to birth weight or GA. Factors leading to decreased IVH incidence deserve further study, via single- and cross-center methodologies, to enhance decision-making regarding resuscitation and care of these highly at-risk neonates.

Details

ISSN :
03783782
Volume :
85
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Early Human Development
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....76934ff965ebf350436b6e04d26f23d8
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2008.09.411