Back to Search Start Over

Accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound in staging and restaging patients with locally advanced rectal cancer undergoing neoadjuvant chemoradiation

Authors :
Secondo Lastoria
Fabiana Tatangelo
Biagio Pecori
Elena Di Girolamo
Giovanni Di Nardo
Paolo Delrio
Giovanni Battista Rossi
Valentina D’Angelo
Vincenzo Rosario Iaffaioli
P. Marone
Mario De Bellis
Antonio Avallone
Source :
Clinics and Research in Hepatology and Gastroenterology. 35:666-670
Publication Year :
2011
Publisher :
Elsevier BV, 2011.

Abstract

Summary Background To date, the role of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) in restaging locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NAT) have not been thoroughly investigated. Aim To evaluate accuracy and clinical usefulness of EUS for both staging and restaging LARC. Methods According to EUS staging, patients with LARC were enrolled in the study. Those who underwent surgery directly represented a control group useful for evaluating the accuracy of EUS in staging LARC. In the study group, EUS was repeated seven weeks after NAT, before surgery. The results of EUS were compared with the corresponding pTN stages. Results From 2000 to 2006, 212 consecutive patients with RC underwent EUS staging. Among them EUS diagnosed 162 LARC (M/F = 93/69; mean age: 60 years [range 40–80]). The final study group included 85 patients with LARC. EUS restaging had an overall accuracy of 61% and 59% for T and N-stage, respectively. In the control group, the accuracy of EUS in staging LARC was 86% and 58% for T and N-stage, respectively. Conclusion EUS accurately stages LARC and enables appropriate decision-making, with selection of those patients who need NAT. On the other hand, EUS restaging of LARC after NAT has low accuracy and should not be used in clinical practice.

Details

ISSN :
22107401
Volume :
35
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Clinics and Research in Hepatology and Gastroenterology
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....764cd22f2a684f6d28c9452107739bf5
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinre.2011.05.012