Back to Search
Start Over
Evaluation of two nutritional scores' association with systemic treatment toxicity and survival in metastatic colorectal cancer: an AGEO prospective multicentre study
- Source :
- European Journal of Cancer, European Journal of Cancer, Elsevier, 2019, 119, pp.35-43. ⟨10.1016/j.ejca.2019.07.011⟩
- Publication Year :
- 2019
- Publisher :
- Elsevier BV, 2019.
-
Abstract
- Introduction The Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment (PG-SGA) is currently the standard nutritional assessment tool for patients with cancer. In a retrospective assessment of a prospective cohort, we showed that the Nutritional Risk Index (NRI) seemed to be associated with treatment toxicity and survival in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Objective The objective of this study was to compare these two nutritional tools (PG-SGA and NRI) on their correlation with chemotherapy-related toxicity and survival in non–pre-treated patients with mCRC. Methods This prospective multicentre observational study enrolled non–pre-treated patients with mCRC. PG-SGA and NRI were performed at the onset of first-line chemotherapy. Treatment-related toxicities were registered according to National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria Adverse Event version 4.0. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated from the start of treatment. Results A total of 168 patients were included from eight French centres. Patients were considered malnourished in 41% of cases according to PG-SGA and 56% of cases according to the NRI. In multivariate analysis, malnutrition according to PG-SGA was significantly associated with chemotherapy-related grade ≥2 clinical toxicities (odds ratio: 3.7; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.7–8.4; p = 0.001) and OS (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.6; 95% CI: 1.3–5.3; p = 0.006), but not with PFS (HR: 1.5; 95% CI: 0.8–2.6; p = 0.2). Conversely, malnutrition according to the NRI was not significantly associated with these tolerance and efficacy parameters. Conclusion Although more complex to perform in daily oncology practice, the PG-SGA score appears to be the best nutritional assessment tool because of its strong association with clinically relevant oncological outcomes such as OS and treatment-related toxicities in patients with mCRC.
- Subjects :
- Male
0301 basic medicine
Cancer Research
medicine.medical_specialty
Multivariate analysis
Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions
Colorectal cancer
[SDV]Life Sciences [q-bio]
Nutritional Status
Kaplan-Meier Estimate
03 medical and health sciences
0302 clinical medicine
Internal medicine
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols
medicine
Humans
Prospective Studies
Neoplasm Metastasis
Prospective cohort study
Adverse effect
Chemotherapy toxicity
Aged
2. Zero hunger
Metastatic colorectal cancer
business.industry
Malnutrition
Hazard ratio
Cancer
Odds ratio
Middle Aged
Prognosis
medicine.disease
Confidence interval
3. Good health
[SDV] Life Sciences [q-bio]
Nutrition Assessment
030104 developmental biology
Oncology
030220 oncology & carcinogenesis
Multivariate Analysis
NRI
PG-SGA
Female
Colorectal Neoplasms
business
Subjects
Details
- ISSN :
- 09598049
- Volume :
- 119
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- European Journal of Cancer
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....7635ae48e0e90eba8929442c20ee4703
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2019.07.011