Back to Search Start Over

Prospective Study Assessing Impact of Ethylene Oxide Sterilization on Endoscopic Ultrasound Image Quality

Authors :
Shounak Majumder
Zaiyang Long
Alexander W. Hooke
Bret T. Petersen
Ferga C. Gleeson
Marco Bruno
John DeWitt
Grace Elta
Larissa Fuji
Victoria Gomez
Laurent Palazzo
Vanessa M. Shami
Tyler Stevens
Mark D. Topazian
Maurits J. Wiersema
Lawrence J. Berglund
Barham K. Abu Dayyeh
Vinay Chandrasekhara
Prasad G. Iyer
Elizabeth Rajan
Andrew C. Storm
Kenneth K. Wang
Ryan Lennon
Joseph J. Larson
Felicity T. Enders
Jed R. Frein
Raymond A. Yates
Nicholas J. Hangiandreou
Michael J. Levy
Gastroenterology & Hepatology
Source :
Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology, 20(12), 2780-2789. W.B. Saunders
Publication Year :
2022

Abstract

Background & Aims: Duodenoscope-associated transmission of infections has raised questions about efficacy of endoscope reprocessing using high-level disinfection (HLD). Although ethylene oxide (ETO) gas sterilization is effective in eradicating microbes, the impact of ETO on endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) imaging equipment remains unknown. In this study, we aimed to compare the changes in EUS image quality associated with HLD vs HLD followed by ETO sterilization. Methods: Four new EUS instruments were assigned to 2 groups: Group 1 (HLD) and Group 2 (HLD + ETO). The echoendoscopes were assessed at baseline, monthly for 6 months, and once every 3 to 4 months thereafter, for a total of 12 time points. At each time point, review of EUS video and still image quality was performed by an expert panel of reviewers along with phantom-based objective testing. Linear mixed effects models were used to assess whether the modality of reprocessing impacted image and video quality. Results: For clinical testing, mixed linear models showed minimal quantitative differences in linear analog score (P =. 04; estimated change, 3.12; scale, 0–100) and overall image quality value (P =. 007; estimated change, −0.12; scale, 1–5) favoring ETO but not for rank value (P =. 06). On phantom testing, maximum depth of penetration was lower for ETO endoscopes (P

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
15423565
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology, 20(12), 2780-2789. W.B. Saunders
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....75473a0d806978e69309c8c8a5ebc5ae