Back to Search Start Over

Data from Efficacy and Biological Activity of Imatinib in Metastatic Dermatofibrosarcoma Protuberans (DFSP)

Authors :
Paolo G. Casali
Chiara Castelli
Silvana Pilotti
Federica Grosso
Bruno Vincenzi
Elena Palassini
Elena Conca
Angelo P. Dei Tos
Marco Fiore
Alessandro Gronchi
Roberta Maestro
Valentina Indio
Milena Urbini
Gian Paolo Dagrada
Marcella Tazzari
Annalisa Astolfi
Tiziana Negri
Maria A. Pantaleo
Silvia Stacchiotti
Publication Year :
2023
Publisher :
American Association for Cancer Research (AACR), 2023.

Abstract

Purpose: To report on imatinib mesylate (IM) in patients with metastatic dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans (DFSP)/fibrosarcomatous (FS)-DFSP and on the impact of the treatment on tumor biology.Experimental design: Ten consecutive patients treated with IM from 2007 to 2015 for a metastatic relapse from DFSP/FS-DFSP were identified. FISH analysis for COL1A1-PDGFB was performed. Two IM-treated and 4 naïve FS-DFSP were transcriptionally profiled by RNAseq on HiScanSQ platform. Differential gene expression was analyzed with edgeR (Bioconductor), followed by hierarchical clustering and Principal Component Analysis.Results: All cases featured fibrosarcomatous in the metastasis and retained the COL1A1-PDGFB. Best RECIST response was: 8 partial response, 1 stable disease, and 1 progressive disease. Median progression-free survival was 11 months. Five patients received surgery after IM and all relapsed. IM was restored in 4 patients with a new response. After IM, the most upregulated genes included those encoding for immunoglobulins and those affecting functions and differentiation of endothelial cells. Pathway enrichment analysis revealed upregulation in genes involved in antigen processing and presentation, natural killer–mediated cytotoxicity, and drug and xenobiotics metabolism. Conversely, a significant down-regulation of kinase signaling pathways was detected.Conclusions: All metastatic cases were fibrosarcomatous. Most patients responded to IM, but PFS was shorter than reported in published series which included both DFSP and FS-DFSP. All patients operated after IM had a relapse, suggesting that IM cannot eradicate metastatic cases and that the role of surgery is limited. Transcriptional profile of naïve and posttreatment samples pointed the contribution of immune infiltrates in sustaining the response to IM. Clin Cancer Res; 22(4); 837–46. ©2015 AACR.

Details

Database :
OpenAIRE
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....74631eafbf2df976f7d3984ffff9dce7
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.c.6524678