Back to Search Start Over

Matched pair analysis for comparison of survival outcome of alternative regimens to standard three-weekly cisplatin-based concurrent chemoradiation of head and neck cancer

Authors :
Vishal Gupta
Sung Jun Ma
Wesley L. Hicks
Michael R. Markiewicz
Gregory M. Hermann
Anurag K. Singh
Moni A. Kuriakose
Andrew D. Ray
Hye Ri Han
Fangyi Gu
Mary E. Platek
Austin J. Iovoli
Hassan Arshad
Kimberly E. Wooten
Jon M. Chan
Ryan P. McSpadden
Source :
Ann Transl Med
Publication Year :
2021
Publisher :
AME Publishing Company, 2021.

Abstract

Background To compare head and neck cancer (HNC) patients treated with three-weekly versus weekly cisplatin-based or other chemotherapy-based concurrent chemoradiation (CRT) and CRT with versus without induction chemotherapy (ICT) to investigate differences in overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS). Methods HNC patients treated with definitive or adjuvant CRT at Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center between 2003 and 2017 were retrospectively reviewed. Propensity score matching was performed to obtain three sets of balanced matched pairs: three-weekly and weekly cisplatin CRT, three weekly and non-cisplatin CRT, CRT with and without ICT. Multivariate Cox regression and Kaplan-Meier analyses were used to estimate and compare survival outcomes. Results A total of 623 patients received either definitive (81%) or post-operative (19%) RT. Of these, 283 patients concurrently received three-weekly cisplatin (45%); 189 patients (30%) received weekly cisplatin; 151 patients (24%) received non-cisplatin regimen. Median follow-up was 55.4 months (interquartile range, 38.0-88.7). Patients who received CRT alone and those who received ICT and CRT had no difference in 5-year OS (51.5% and 41.0% respectively, P=0.53) and CSS (64.9% and 49.7% respectively, P=0.21). Compared to patients who received three-weekly cisplatin, patients who received weekly cisplatin had no difference in 5-year OS (59.3% vs. 54.1%, P=0.35) and CSS (70.3% vs. 62.4%, P=0.09); patients who received non-cisplatin CRT also had no difference in 5-year OS (54.5% vs. 58.3%, P=0.51) and CSS (67.5% vs. 64.7%, P=0.45). Conclusions No significant difference in OS and CSS was observed in any of the three pairs of CRT regimens. ICT prior to CRT did not improve survival of CRT alone. Non-cisplatin and weekly cisplatin regimens did not prove to be inferior to the standard three-weekly cisplatin.

Details

ISSN :
23055847 and 23055839
Volume :
9
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Annals of Translational Medicine
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....73fe7acdfd417eb0c0749b72496b20e7
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.21037/atm-20-5032