Back to Search
Start Over
Performance of InBios ZIKV Detect™ 2.0 IgM Capture ELISA in two reference laboratories compared to the original ZIKV Detect™ IgM Capture ELISA
- Source :
- Journal of virological methods
- Publication Year :
- 2019
- Publisher :
- Elsevier BV, 2019.
-
Abstract
- ZIKV Detect™ 2.0 IgM Capture ELISA (InBios International, Seattle, WA) recently replaced the ZIKV Detect™ IgM Capture ELISA and a number of significant changes have been made to the original version. This study compares data generated from the ZIKV Detect™ 2.0 IgM Capture ELISA, to data generated using the original version of the kit. The same sample sets were used in this comparison, and reference test results for these samples were used to assess sensitivity, specificity, accuracy and concordance of results across two laboratories. Average sensitivity increased from 90.4% to 92.5% with the updated kit where the increase was not statistically different, and specificity increased from 79.5% to 97.4%, a statistically-significant difference. Accuracy of the ZIKV Detect™ 2.0 IgM Capture ELISA was 89% compared to 63.9% for the original version of the kit, and agreement across the laboratories increased from 79.5% to 97.4%. With secondary dengue virus infections, specificity increased from 9.3% to 82.6% with the updated kit, primarily due to the change in interpretation criteria that no longer includes "Possible Zika positive."
- Subjects :
- 0301 basic medicine
IgM
030106 microbiology
Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay
Biology
Dengue virus
Antibodies, Viral
medicine.disease_cause
Sensitivity and Specificity
Article
InBios
03 medical and health sciences
Reference test
Zika
Virology
medicine
Humans
Clinical Laboratory Techniques
Zika Virus Infection
Capture elisa
Zika Virus
Reference Standards
030104 developmental biology
Immunoglobulin M
ELISA
Version 2.0
Reagent Kits, Diagnostic
Subjects
Details
- ISSN :
- 01660934
- Volume :
- 271
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- Journal of Virological Methods
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....73f2a0b5e92495c6905b5e741185600b
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jviromet.2019.05.011