Back to Search Start Over

How measurement science can improve confidence in research results

Authors :
John T. Elliott
Chandler A. Becker
Antonio Possolo
Ronald F. Boisvert
Robert J. Hanisch
Anne L. Plant
Source :
PLoS Biology, PLoS Biology, Vol 16, Iss 4, p e2004299 (2018)
Publication Year :
2018

Abstract

The current push for rigor and reproducibility is driven by a desire for confidence in research results. Here, we suggest a framework for a systematic process, based on consensus principles of measurement science, to guide researchers and reviewers in assessing, documenting, and mitigating the sources of uncertainty in a study. All study results have associated ambiguities that are not always clarified by simply establishing reproducibility. By explicitly considering sources of uncertainty, noting aspects of the experimental system that are difficult to characterize quantitatively, and proposing alternative interpretations, the researcher provides information that enhances comparability and reproducibility.

Details

ISSN :
15457885
Volume :
16
Issue :
4
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
PLoS biology
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....73e07234a67bde7684811649a2bf8504