Back to Search Start Over

Comparison of greenhouse gas fluxes and nitrogen budgets from an ombotrophic bog in Scotland and a minerotrophic sedge fen in Finland

Authors :
Mika Aurela
Mark A. Sutton
Ute Skiba
Rebecca McKenzie
Kerry J. Dinsmore
Terhi K. Laurila
Annalea Lohila
Kari Minkkinen
Julia Drewer
Carole Helfter
Christophe Flechard
Timo Penttilä
Centre for Ecology and Hydrology
Finnish Meteorological Institute (FMI)
Department of Forest Ecology, Peatland Ecology Group
University of Helsinki
Vantaa Research Unit
Finnish Forest Research Institute
Sol Agro et hydrosystème Spatialisation (SAS)
AGROCAMPUS OUEST
Institut national d'enseignement supérieur pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement (Institut Agro)-Institut national d'enseignement supérieur pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement (Institut Agro)-Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA)
Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA)-AGROCAMPUS OUEST
AGROCAMPUS OUEST-Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA)
Source :
European Journal of Soil Science, European Journal of Soil Science, Wiley, 2010, 61 (5), pp.640-650. ⟨10.1111/j.1365-2389.2010.01267.x⟩
Publication Year :
2010
Publisher :
Wiley, 2010.

Abstract

Northern peatlands cover approximately 4% of the global land surface area. Those peatlands will be particularly vulnerable to environmental and climate change and therefore it is important to investigate their total greenhouse gas (GHG) budgets, to determine the feedback on the climate. Nitrogen (N) is known to influence the GHG budget in particular by affecting the methane (CH(4)) balance. At two peatland sites in Scotland and Finland GHG fluxes of carbon dioxide (CO(2)), methane and nitrous oxide (N(2)O) and nitrogen fluxes were measured as part of the European project 'NitroEurope'. The Scottish site, Auchencorth Moss, was a GHG sink of -321, -490 and -321 g CO(2) eq m(-2) year(-1) in 2006, 2007 and 2008, respectively, with CO(2) as the dominating GHG. In contrast, the dominating GHG at the Finnish site, Lompolojankka, was CH(4), resulting in the site being a net GHG source of +485 and +431 g CO(2) eq m(-2) year(-1) in 2006 and 2007, respectively. Therefore. Auchencorth Moss had a negative global warming potential (GWP) whilst Lompolojankka had a positive GWP over the investigated time period. Initial results yielded a positive N budget for Lompolojankka of 7.1 kg N ha(-1) year(-1), meaning the site was gaining nitrogen, and a negative N budget for Auchencorth Moss of -2.4 kg N ha year(-1), meaning the site was losing nitrogen.

Details

ISSN :
13510754 and 13652389
Volume :
61
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
European Journal of Soil Science
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....73df72b4fbc7c255ee2b83d0a2d93220
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2389.2010.01267.x