Back to Search Start Over

Accuracy of vital parameters measured by a wearable patch following major abdominal cancer surgery

Authors :
Jai Scheerhoorn
R. Arthur Bouwman
Ignace H. J. T. de Hingh
Natal A. W. van Riel
Eveline Mestrom
Volkher Scharnhorst
Fleur Jacobs
Jonna Adinda van der Stam
Arjen-Kars Boer
Simon W. Nienhuijs
Epidemiologie
RS: GROW - R3 - Innovative Cancer Diagnostics & Therapy
Maastricht Centre for Systems Biology
RS: FSE MaCSBio
Systems Biology and Metabolic Disease
Eindhoven MedTech Innovation Center
Computational Biology
Center for Care & Cure Technology Eindhoven
Biomedical Diagnostics Lab
Signal Processing Systems
EAISI Health
Chemical Biology
Electrical Engineering
Experimental Vascular Medicine
ACS - Microcirculation
AGEM - Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism
Source :
European Journal of Surgical Oncology, 48(4), 917-923. ELSEVIER SCI LTD, European Journal of Surgical Oncology, 48(4), 917-923. W.B. Saunders Ltd, European journal of surgical oncology. W.B. Saunders Ltd
Publication Year :
2022
Publisher :
ELSEVIER SCI LTD, 2022.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Recent advances in wearable technology allow for the development of wirelessly connected sensors to continuously measure vital parameters in the general ward or even at home. The present study assesses the accuracy of a wearable patch (Healthdot) for continuous monitoring of heartrate (HR) and respiration rate (RR).MATERIALS AND METHODS: The Healthdot measures HR and RR by means of chest accelerometry. The study population consisted of patients following major abdominal oncological surgery. The analysis focused on the agreement between HR and RR measured by the Healthdot and the gold standard patient monitor in the intensive and post-anesthesia care unit.RESULTS: For HR, a total of 112 h of measurements was collected in 26 patients. For RR, a total of 102 h of measurements was collected in 21 patients. On second to second analysis, 97% of the HR and 87% of the RR measurements were within 5 bpm and 3 rpm of the reference monitor. Assessment of 5-min averaged data resulted in 96% of the HR and 95% of the RR measurements within 5 bpm and 3 rpm of the reference monitor. A Clarke error grid analysis showed that 100% of the HR and 99.4% of the 5-min averaged data was clinically acceptable.CONCLUSION: The Healthdot accurately measured HR and RR in a cohort of patients recovering from major abdominal surgery, provided that good quality data was obtained. These results push the Healthdot forward as a clinically acceptable tool in low acuity settings for unobtrusive, automatic, wireless and continuous monitoring.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
15322157 and 07487983
Volume :
48
Issue :
4
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
European Journal of Surgical Oncology
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....73dbc89946c31e054ff8e13c76a962a4