Back to Search Start Over

Computer-assisted mitotic count using a deep learning-based algorithm improves interobserver reproducibility and accuracy

Authors :
Christof A. Bertram
Marc Aubreville
Taryn A. Donovan
Alexander Bartel
Frauke Wilm
Christian Marzahl
Charles-Antoine Assenmacher
Kathrin Becker
Mark Bennett
Sarah Corner
Brieuc Cossic
Daniela Denk
Martina Dettwiler
Beatriz Garcia Gonzalez
Corinne Gurtner
Ann-Kathrin Haverkamp
Annabelle Heier
Annika Lehmbecker
Sophie Merz
Erica L. Noland
Stephanie Plog
Anja Schmidt
Franziska Sebastian
Dodd G. Sledge
Rebecca C. Smedley
Marco Tecilla
Tuddow Thaiwong
Andrea Fuchs-Baumgartinger
Donald J. Meuten
Katharina Breininger
Matti Kiupel
Andreas Maier
Robert Klopfleisch
Source :
Veterinary pathology. 59(2)
Publication Year :
2021

Abstract

The mitotic count (MC) is an important histological parameter for prognostication of malignant neoplasms. However, it has inter- and intraobserver discrepancies due to difficulties in selecting the region of interest (MC-ROI) and in identifying or classifying mitotic figures (MFs). Recent progress in the field of artificial intelligence has allowed the development of high-performance algorithms that may improve standardization of the MC. As algorithmic predictions are not flawless, computer-assisted review by pathologists may ensure reliability. In the present study, we compared partial (MC-ROI preselection) and full (additional visualization of MF candidates and display of algorithmic confidence values) computer-assisted MC analysis to the routine (unaided) MC analysis by 23 pathologists for whole-slide images of 50 canine cutaneous mast cell tumors (ccMCTs). Algorithmic predictions aimed to assist pathologists in detecting mitotic hotspot locations, reducing omission of MFs, and improving classification against imposters. The interobserver consistency for the MC significantly increased with computer assistance (interobserver correlation coefficient, ICC = 0.92) compared to the unaided approach (ICC = 0.70). Classification into prognostic stratifications had a higher accuracy with computer assistance. The algorithmically preselected hotspot MC-ROIs had a consistently higher MCs than the manually selected MC-ROIs. Compared to a ground truth (developed with immunohistochemistry for phosphohistone H3), pathologist performance in detecting individual MF was augmented when using computer assistance (F1-score of 0.68 increased to 0.79) with a reduction in false negatives by 38%. The results of this study demonstrate that computer assistance may lead to more reproducible and accurate MCs in ccMCTs.

Details

ISSN :
15442217
Volume :
59
Issue :
2
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Veterinary pathology
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....73445159469d1a30994295e324047a29