Back to Search Start Over

Persistence profile to nucleos(t)ide analogue treatment for patients with chronic hepatitis B

Authors :
Encarnación Gómez Fernández
Patricia Monje Agudo
Yolanda Borrego Izquierdo
Mónica Ferrit Martin
Rocío Jiménez Galán
Carmen V Almeida-González
Ramón A. Morillo Verdugo
[Borrego Izquierdo, Yolanda] Valme Univ Hosp, Serv Pharm, Carretera Cadiz S-N, Seville 41014, Spain
[Gomez Fernandez, Encarnacion] Valme Univ Hosp, Serv Pharm, Carretera Cadiz S-N, Seville 41014, Spain
[Monje Agudo, Patricia] Valme Univ Hosp, Serv Pharm, Carretera Cadiz S-N, Seville 41014, Spain
[Jimenez Galan, Rocio] Valme Univ Hosp, Serv Pharm, Carretera Cadiz S-N, Seville 41014, Spain
[Morillo Verdugo, Ramon] Valme Univ Hosp, Serv Pharm, Carretera Cadiz S-N, Seville 41014, Spain
[Almeida-Gonzalez, Carmen V.] Valme Univ Hosp, Seville, Spain
[Ferrit Martin, Monica] Hosp Univ Virgen da las Nieves, Serv Pharm, Granada, Spain
Source :
European journal of hospital pharmacy : science and practice. 23(5)
Publication Year :
2015

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There are currently five approved nucleos(t)ide analogues (NUCs) for the management of chronic hepatitis B (CHB): lamivudine, adefovir dipivoxil, telbivudine, entecavir, and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate. OBJECTIVE: To determine the persistence rates among patients receiving NUCs for CHB at weeks 48, 96 and 144, compare them in these periods, and analyse the evolution of treatment persistence. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study that included patients with CHB who initiated antiviral therapy and were attended to by the pharmaceutical care office between January 2002 and December 2011. Patients included in a clinical trial or patients who did not collect their medication personally were excluded. There were two different analyses: a comparative analysis of the persistence rates in three periods (weeks 1–48, weeks 48–96, and weeks 96–144); and a Kaplan-Meier analysis to evaluate the evolution of persistence. RESULTS: A total of 102 patients were included. Persistence rates were different in the three periods. They decreased during the course of the different periods, and the decline was more rapid between the first and second period. There were statistically significant differences in the non-persistence of the five drugs (p

Details

ISSN :
20479964
Volume :
23
Issue :
5
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
European journal of hospital pharmacy : science and practice
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....728f7d05b0cf14d087ec1ae2b984b284