Improved survival after endoluminal repair with second-generation prostheses compared with open repair in the treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms: A 5-year concurrent comparison using life table method

MLA

Michael S. Stephen, et al. “Improved Survival after Endoluminal Repair with Second-Generation Prostheses Compared with Open Repair in the Treatment of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms: A 5-Year Concurrent Comparison Using Life Table Method.” Journal of Vascular Surgery, vol. 33, no. 2, Feb. 2001, pp. 21–26. EBSCOhost, https://doi.org/10.1067/mva.2001.111660.

APA

Michael S. Stephen, Mark Jones, Cameron N. Ly, John P. Harris, Geoffrey H. White, James W. May, & Richard Waugh. (2001). Improved survival after endoluminal repair with second-generation prostheses compared with open repair in the treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms: A 5-year concurrent comparison using life table method. Journal of Vascular Surgery, 33(2), 21–26. https://doi.org/10.1067/mva.2001.111660

Chicago

Michael S. Stephen, Mark Jones, Cameron N. Ly, John P. Harris, Geoffrey H. White, James W. May, and Richard Waugh. 2001. “Improved Survival after Endoluminal Repair with Second-Generation Prostheses Compared with Open Repair in the Treatment of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms: A 5-Year Concurrent Comparison Using Life Table Method.” Journal of Vascular Surgery 33 (2): 21–26. doi:10.1067/mva.2001.111660.