Back to Search
Start Over
Randomized Phase III Trial to Test Accelerated Versus Standard Fractionation in Combination With Concurrent Cisplatin for Head and Neck Carcinomas in the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 0129 Trial: Long-Term Report of Efficacy and Toxicity
- Source :
- Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, vol 32, iss 34
- Publication Year :
- 2014
- Publisher :
- American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), 2014.
-
Abstract
- Purpose We tested the efficacy and toxicity of cisplatin plus accelerated fractionation with a concomitant boost (AFX-C) versus standard fractionation (SFX) in locally advanced head and neck carcinoma (LA-HNC). Patients and Methods Patients had stage III to IV carcinoma of the oral cavity, oropharynx, hypopharynx, or larynx. Radiation therapy schedules were 70 Gy in 35 fractions over 7 weeks (SFX) or 72 Gy in 42 fractions over 6 weeks (AFX-C). Cisplatin doses were 100 mg/m2 once every 3 weeks for two (AFX-C) or three (SFX) cycles. Toxicities were scored by using National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria 2.0 and the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group/European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer criteria. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) rates were estimated by using the Kaplan-Meier method and were compared by using the one-sided log-rank test. Locoregional failure (LRF) and distant metastasis (DM) rates were estimated by using the cumulative incidence method and Gray's test. Results In all, 721 of 743 patients were analyzable (361, SFX; 360, AFX-C). At a median follow-up of 7.9 years (range, 0.3 to 10.1 years) for 355 surviving patients, no differences were observed in OS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.96; 95% CI, 0.79 to 1.18; P = .37; 8-year survival, 48% v 48%), PFS (HR, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.84 to 1.24; P = .52; 8-year estimate, 42% v 41%), LRF (HR, 1.08; 95% CI, 0.84 to 1.38; P = .78; 8-year estimate, 37% v 39%), or DM (HR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.56 to 1.24; P = .16; 8-year estimate, 15% v 13%). For oropharyngeal cancer, p16-positive patients had better OS than p16-negative patients (HR, 0.30; 95% CI, 0.21 to 0.42; P < .001; 8-year survival, 70.9% v 30.2%). There were no statistically significant differences in the grade 3 to 5 acute or late toxicities between the two arms and p-16 status. Conclusion When combined with cisplatin, AFX-C neither improved outcome nor increased late toxicity in patients with LA-HNC. Long-term high survival rates in p16-positive patients with oropharyngeal cancer support the ongoing efforts to explore deintensification.
- Subjects :
- Male
Oncology
Cancer Research
Time Factors
medicine.medical_treatment
Kaplan-Meier Estimate
law.invention
Randomized controlled trial
Risk Factors
law
80 and over
Cumulative incidence
Dose Fractionation
Cancer
Aged, 80 and over
Radiation
Hazard ratio
Chemoradiotherapy
Middle Aged
6.5 Radiotherapy and other non-invasive therapies
Treatment Outcome
Head and Neck Neoplasms
Toxicity
Disease Progression
Female
Adult
medicine.medical_specialty
Clinical Trials and Supportive Activities
Clinical Sciences
Oncology and Carcinogenesis
Antineoplastic Agents
Disease-Free Survival
Rare Diseases
Clinical Research
Internal medicine
medicine
Carcinoma
Humans
Oncology & Carcinogenesis
Dental/Oral and Craniofacial Disease
Neoplasm Staging
Aged
business.industry
Prevention
Dose fractionation
Evaluation of treatments and therapeutic interventions
medicine.disease
Radiation therapy
Dose Fractionation, Radiation
Cisplatin
Digestive Diseases
business
Subjects
Details
- ISSN :
- 15277755 and 0732183X
- Volume :
- 32
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....72521a871d8971c0c6c4ff3cd20e23f9
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2014.55.3925