Back to Search Start Over

Consensus statement on the multidisciplinary management of patients with recurrent and primary rectal cancer beyond total mesorectal excision planes

Authors :
S. T. O'Dwyer
J. E. Fitzgerald
Alex H. Mirnezami
David Sebag-Montefiore
C. J. Swallow
Frank A. Frizelle
Brendan J. Moran
Edward C.T.H. Tan
P. C. Rasmussen
D. Dietz
N. van As
R. Hompes
Pallavi Sagar
Bruce George
S. M. Ali
D. McArthur
A. Desai
Paris Tekkis
P. R. O'Connell
A. Dziki
R. Guy
J. H W de Wilt
A. Pallan
Malcolm S Wilson
Dean A. Harris
Ashish Gupta
R. J. Nicholls
Panagiotis Georgiou
Alexander G. Heriot
J. Faria
John T. Jenkins
R. P. Kiran
N. Mortensen
Rob Glynne-Jones
L. Jeys
D. Herzig
Robert D. Goldin
K. W D Ramsey
Anthony Antoniou
P. Bose
T. Wiggers
Eric J. Dozois
M. Marshall
Wai Lun Law
Harm J. T. Rutten
Diana Tait
K. Boyle
Gina Brown
S. Radley
Cherry E. Koh
Christopher H. Crane
P. Colquhoun
D. Burling
M. L. George
M. Duff
G. Chang
Partha Das
Conor P. Delaney
L. Stocchi
Uday B. Patel
Des C. Winter
Aneel Bhangu
A. Oliver
Michael J. Solomon
Prashant Patel
T. Vuong
C.R.J. Woodhouse
Torbjörn Holm
C. Richard
Susan K. Clark
G. Branagan
Søren Laurberg
Deena Harji
J. Beynon
A. S. Liberman
Ara Darzi
Maria A. Hawkins
M. Davies
E. Myers
Source :
British Journal of Surgery, 100, 8, pp. E1-E33, Laurberg, S & Beyond TME Collaborative 2013, ' Consensus statement on the multidisciplinary management of patients with recurrent and primary rectal cancer beyond total mesorectal excision planes ', British Journal of Surgery, vol. 100, no. 8, pp. 1009-1014 . https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.9192, British Journal of Surgery, 100, E1-E33
Publication Year :
2013

Abstract

Consensus abstract Background The management of primary rectal cancer beyond total mesorectal excision planes (PRC-bTME) and recurrent rectal cancer (RRC) is challenging. There is global variation in standards and no guidelines exist. To achieve cure most patients require extended, multivisceral, exenterative surgery, beyond conventional total mesorectal excision planes. The aim of the Beyond TME Group was to achieve consensus on the definitions and principles of management, and to identify areas of research priority. Methods Delphi methodology was used to achieve consensus. The Group consisted of invited experts from surgery, radiology, oncology and pathology. The process included two international dedicated discussion conferences, formal feedback, three rounds of editing and two rounds of anonymized web-based voting. Consensus was achieved with more than 80 per cent agreement; less than 80 per cent agreement indicated low consensus. During conferences held in September 2011 and March 2012, open discussion took place on areas in which there is a low level of consensus. Results The final consensus document included 51 voted statements, making recommendations on ten key areas of PRC-bTME and RRC. Consensus agreement was achieved on the recommendations of 49 statements, with 34 achieving consensus in over 95 per cent. The lowest level of consensus obtained was 76 per cent. There was clear identification of the need for referral to a specialist multidisciplinary team for diagnosis, assessment and further management. Conclusion The consensus process has provided guidance for the management of patients with PRC-bTME or RRC, taking into account global variations in surgical techniques and technology. It has further identified areas of research priority.

Details

ISSN :
00071323
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
British Journal of Surgery, 100, 8, pp. E1-E33, Laurberg, S & Beyond TME Collaborative 2013, ' Consensus statement on the multidisciplinary management of patients with recurrent and primary rectal cancer beyond total mesorectal excision planes ', British Journal of Surgery, vol. 100, no. 8, pp. 1009-1014 . https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.9192, British Journal of Surgery, 100, E1-E33
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....723ce62888fd75314b221fbeb37dc083