Comparison of the Short Test of Mental Status and the Montreal Cognitive Assessment Across the Cognitive Spectrum

OBJECTIVE: To compare the Short Test of Mental Status (STMS) to the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) for predicting and detecting mild cognitive impairment (MCI). METHODS: Participants from the community-based Mayo Clinic Study of Aging (MCSA) (November 24, 2010 through May 19, 2012) and an academic referral Alzheimer’s Disease Research Center (ADRC) (March 16, 2015 through September 5, 2018) were analyzed. All participants were evaluated using a standardized neuropsychological battery and a multidisciplinary consensus diagnosis was assigned. The MCSA sample included 313 stable cognitively normal (CN) participants, 72 participants with normal cognition at baseline who developed incident MCI or dementia, 114 participants with prevalent MCI, and 25 participants with dementia. The ADRC included 106 stable CN participants, 8 incident MCI/dementia, 96 prevalent MCI, and 132 dementia. RESULTS: There was no significant difference between the two tests in 6 of 7 diagnostic comparisons across academic referral and community populations. The STMS had a better AUC [0.898, 95% CI: (0.865, 0.932)] for differentiating prevalent MCI from CN participants in the MCSA cohort compared to the MoCA [0.848, 95% CI: (0.808, 0.889)], P=.01. Additionally, 53% of our stable cognitively normal participants scored < 26 on the MoCA, with a specificity of 47% for diagnosing prevalent MCI. CONCLUSIONS: We provide evidence that the STMS performs similarly to the MoCA in a variety of settings and neurodegenerative syndromes. Our results suggest that the current recommended MoCA cutoff may be overly sensitive, consistent with previous studies. We also provide a conversion table for comparing the two cognitive tests.