Back to Search Start Over

Analytical validation of new ELISAs for the quantitation of polyclonal free light chains and comparison to existing assays for healthy and patient samples

Authors :
Jennifer L J Heaney
Meena Shemar
Margaret Goodall
Christopher William Hand
Mark T. Drayson
Tim Plant
John Campbell
Source :
Heaney, J L J, Campbell, J, Goodall, M, Plant, T, Shemar, M, Hand, C & Drayson, M T 2020, ' Analytical validation of new ELISAs for the quantitation of polyclonal free light chains and comparison to existing assays for healthy and patient samples ', Journal of Immunological Methods, vol. 478, 112713 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jim.2019.112713
Publication Year :
2020
Publisher :
Elsevier BV, 2020.

Abstract

Background Polyclonal FLCs can be used as a biomarker of inflammation and immune activation in a range of diseases. This study evaluated the performance of new FLC ELISAs (Seralite FLC ELISA) for the quantitation of polyclonal κ and λ FLC, including comparisons to existing assays. Methods Technical performance was assessed for the ELISA and reference ranges were generated using healthy donor serum (N = 91). Patients with a range of conditions associated with polyclonal FLC dysregulation (N = 164) were measured across platforms. Results The ELISAs generated references ranges of: 8.72–23.0 mg/L κ FLC, and 8.52–25.24 mg/L for λ FLC. ELISAs demonstrated linearity across the calibration range and intra-assay (≤ 8.7%) and inter-assay (≤ 12.3%) imprecision was low. The limit of detection was 0.63 mg/L for κ and 0.57 mg/L for λ FLC. Minimal cross-reactivity was observed for interference agents, alternate FLC and whole immunoglobulin (median change ≤3.6 mg/L). Assays showed good batch-to-batch consistency. For patient samples, methods generated different κ and λ FLC concentrations and differences were seen between methods for the number of patients classified as below, with and above references ranges for κ and λ FLC. There was no significant difference in the FLC sum between the different techniques. Conclusions The ELISAs displayed good analytical and technical performance. The quantification of individual κ and λ FLC appears inherently different between platforms. These differences are attenuated if using the FLC sum, which was similar between methods and provided agreement in relation to patients having normal or elevated FLCs.

Details

ISSN :
00221759
Volume :
478
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Journal of Immunological Methods
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....71a08851b050121bb078748c569e4a53
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jim.2019.112713