Back to Search Start Over

RS3: PSYCHOMETRIC EVALUATION OF THE CAP-SYM QUESTIONNAIRE: A NEW, PATIENT-BASED MEASURE OF SYMPTOMS IN COMMUNITY ACQUIRED PNEUMONIA

Authors :
I Duprat-Lomon
Pierre-Philippe Sagnier
Donna L. Lamping
Sara Schroter
Source :
Value in Health. (2):65
Publisher :
International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research (ISPOR). Published by Elsevier Inc.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To develop a practical and scientifically rigorous, patient-based outcome questionnaire to evaluate symptoms in community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). METHODS: The CAP-Symptom questionnaire (CAP-Sym) is an 18-item, interviewer-administered questionnaire that measures the bothersomeness of 18 symptoms during the past 24 hours using a 6-point Likert scale. We used gold-standard psychometric methods to comprehensively evaluate the acceptability, reliability, validity and responsiveness of the CAP-Sym in field testing involving 556 patients in 13 countries. The development and validation of the CAP-Sym were carried out as part of the CAP 2000 study, a multicentre, multinational, prospective, randomised, double-blind study to compare the effectiveness of moxifloxacin oral tablets to standard oral treatment regimes in patients with CAP. RESULTS: Field testing in all countries confirmed the acceptability (item non-response, item endorsement frequencies, item/scale floor and ceiling effects), reliability (internal consistency, item-total and inter-item correlations, test-retest reliability), validity (content, construct, convergent, discriminant, known groups) and responsiveness of the CAP-Sym. CONCLUSIONS: The CAP-Sym is a practical and scientifically sound patient-based outcome measure that can be used to evaluate CAP-related symptoms in clinical trials or clinical audit. The disease-specific CAP-Sym shows preliminary evidence of being more responsive than the generic SF-36 as a measure of outcome in CAP.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
10983015
Issue :
2
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Value in Health
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....719120c09696a113476c3ce9fde69ee2
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1524-4733.2001.40201-47.x