Back to Search
Start Over
Mantle-induced temperature anomalies do not reach the inner core boundary
- Source :
- Geophysical Journal International. 219:S21-S32
- Publication Year :
- 2019
- Publisher :
- Oxford University Press (OUP), 2019.
-
Abstract
- SUMMARY Temperature anomalies in Earth’s liquid core reflect the vigour of convection and the nature and extent of thermal core–mantle coupling. Numerical simulations suggest that longitudinal temperature anomalies forced by lateral heat flow variations at the core–mantle boundary (CMB) can greatly exceed the anomalies that arise in homogeneous convection (i.e. with no boundary forcing) and may even penetrate all the way to the inner core boundary. However, it is not clear whether these simulations access the relevant regime for convection in Earth’s core, which is characterized by rapid rotation (low Ekman number E) and strong driving (high Rayleigh number Ra). We access this regime using numerical simulations of non-magnetic rotating convection with imposed heat flow variations at the outer boundary (OB) and investigate the amplitude and spatial pattern of thermal anomalies, focusing on the inner and outer boundaries. The 108 simulations cover the parameter range 10−4 ≤ E ≤ 10−6 and Ra = 1−800 times the critical value. At each Ra and E we consider two heat flow patterns—one derived from seismic tomography and the hemispheric $Y_1^1$ spherical harmonic pattern—with amplitudes measured by the parameter q⋆ = 2.3, 5 as well as the case of homogeneous convection. At the OB the forcing produces strong longitudinal temperature variations that peak in the equatorial region. Scaling relations suggest that the longitudinal variations are weakly dependent on E and Ra and are much stronger than in homogeneous convection, reaching O(1) K at core conditions if q⋆ ≈ 35. At the inner boundary, latitudinal and longitudinal temperature variations depend weakly on Ra and q⋆ and decrease strongly with E, becoming practically indistinguishable between homogeneous and heterogeneous cases at E = 10−6. Interpreted at core conditions our results suggest that heat flow variations on the CMB are unlikely to explain the large-scale variations observed by seismology at the top of the inner core.
- Subjects :
- Physics
Convection
010504 meteorology & atmospheric sciences
Inner core
Mechanics
Rayleigh number
010502 geochemistry & geophysics
01 natural sciences
Mantle (geology)
Geophysics
Geochemistry and Petrology
Seismic tomography
Core–mantle boundary
Thermal
Ekman number
0105 earth and related environmental sciences
Subjects
Details
- ISSN :
- 1365246X and 0956540X
- Volume :
- 219
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- Geophysical Journal International
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....71255c800063263d8122cf08f51cc660
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggz254