Back to Search
Start Over
Is it time to revisit the AO classification of fractures of the distal radius?
- Source :
- The Bone & Joint Journal. :818-823
- Publication Year :
- 2015
- Publisher :
- British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery, 2015.
-
Abstract
- We conducted an observational radiographic study to determine the inter- and intra-observer reliability of the AO classification of fractures of the distal radius. Plain posteroanterior and lateral radiographs of 456 patients with an acute fracture of the distal radius were classified by a consultant orthopaedic hand specialist and two specialist trainees, and the k coefficient for the inter- and intra-observer reliability of the type, group and subgroup classification was calculated. Only the type of fracture (A, B or C) was found to provide substantial intra-observer reliability (k type 0.65). The inclusion of ‘group’ and ‘subgroup’ into the classification reduced the inter-observer reliability to fair (kgroup 0.29, ksubgroup = 0.28) and the intra-observer reliability to moderate (kgroup 0.53, ksubgroup 0.49). Disagreement was found to arise between specific subgroups, which may be amenable to clarification. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2015; 97-B:818–23.
- Subjects :
- Orthodontics
medicine.medical_specialty
Intra-Articular Fractures
business.industry
Radiography
Reproducibility of Results
Radius
Wrist Injuries
Ulna Fractures
Intra observer
Surgery
medicine
Humans
Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
Distal radius fracture
Ao classification
Radius Fractures
business
Reliability (statistics)
Subjects
Details
- ISSN :
- 20494408 and 20494394
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- The Bone & Joint Journal
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....71172234f756e10cd7b6343dcf50be06
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.97b6.33844