Back to Search Start Over

A policy-based framework for the determination of management options to protect vulnerable marine ecosystems under the EU deep-sea access regulations

Authors :
Van denderen, P Daniël
Holah, Helen
Robson, Laura M
Hiddink, Jan Geert
Menot, Lenaick
Pedreschi, Debbi
Kazanidis, Georgios
Llope, Marcos
Turner, Phillip J
Stirling, David
Murillo, F Javier
Kenny, Andrew
Campbell, Neil
Allcock, A Louise
Braga-henriques, Andreia
González-irusta, Jose M
Johnston, Graham
Orejas, Covadonga
Serrano, Alberto
Xavier, Joana R
Hopkins, Peter
Kenchington, Ellen
Nixon, Eugene
Valanko, Sebastian
Hoel, Alf Hakon
Source :
ICES Journal of Marine Science, e-IEO. Repositorio Institucional Digital de Acceso Abierto del Instituto Español de Oceanografía, instname, Ices Journal Of Marine Science (1054-3139) (Oxford University Press (OUP)), 2022-01, Vol. 79, N. 1, P. 34-49
Publication Year :
2021

Abstract

Vulnerable marine ecosystems (VMEs) are particularly susceptible to bottom-fishing activity as they are easily disturbed and slow to recover. A data-driven approach was developed to provide management options for the protection of VMEs under the European Union “deep-sea access regulations.” A total of two options within two scenarios were developed. The first scenario defined VME closure areas without consideration of fishing activity. Option 1 proposed closures for the protection of VME habitats and likely habitat, while Option 2 also included areas where four types of VME geophysical elements were present. The second scenario additionally considered fishing. This scenario used VME biomass—fishing intensity relationships to identify a threshold where effort of mobile bottom-contact gears was low and unlikely to have caused significant adverse impacts. Achieving a high level of VME protection requires the creation of many closures (> 100), made up of many small (∼50 km2) and fewer larger closures (> 1000 km2). The greatest protection of VMEs will affect approximately 9% of the mobile fleet fishing effort, while closure scenarios that avoid highly fished areas reduce this to around 4–6%. The framework allows managers to choose the level of risk-aversion they wish to apply in protecting VMEs by comparing alternative strategies.<br />SI

Details

ISSN :
10959289
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
ICES Journal of Marine Science
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....70dbc903b173cd02e23466b3e0fc471b
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsab237