Back to Search Start Over

Using Electrocardiographic Activation Time and Diastolic Intervals to Separate Focal From Macro–Re-Entrant Atrial Tachycardias

Authors :
David E. Krummen
Gregory K. Feld
Jason P. Brown
Sanjiv M. Narayan
Source :
Journal of the American College of Cardiology. (19):1965-1973
Publisher :
American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Abstract

ObjectivesThis study was designed to separate focal from atypical macro–re-entrant atrial tachycardia (AT) on the electrocardiogram (ECG).BackgroundFocal AT often cannot be distinguished from macro–re-entrant AT until the time of electrophysiology study (EPS). We hypothesized that quantitative ECG metrics should separate focal AT, using its short activation relative to tachycardia cycle length (CL), from macro–re-entrant AT, whose activation should span the CL. We developed tools to accurately quantify CL and P- or F-wave duration even when overlying T waves, then prospectively applied them to patients during focal or macro–re-entrant AT ablation and compared them to the gold standard EPS diagnosis.MethodsWe studied 41 patients (27 men, 14 women) age 57 ± 17 years. In the training group (n = 20), tachycardia P or F waves overlying T waves were identified from transitions in slope (dV/dt) relative to “expected” T waves generated from scaling of the sinus-rate T-wave. Electrocardiographic P-wave duration agreed with the duration of intra-atrial activation. Autocorrelation was used to estimate ECG atrial CL (p < 0.001).ResultsCompared to macro–re-entry (n = 13), focal AT (n = 7) had shorter P waves (115 ± 31 ms vs. 227 ± 67 ms; p < 0.001) that were smaller ratios of CL (28 ± 7% vs. 85 ± 21%; p < 0.001). Receiver-operating characteristic curve areas for AT were 0.92 for P(F)-wave duration and 0.99 for P(F)/CL ratio. On blinded prospective analysis (n = 21), P(F)-wave duration

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
07351097
Issue :
19
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....7085c3a5e1e50275075d386a437e9828
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2006.10.080