Long-Term Outcomes Following Elective Repair of Intact Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms

Compare long-term mortality, secondary intervention and secondary rupture following elective endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) and open surgical repair (OSR).EVAR has surpassed OSR as the most common procedure used to repair abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA), but evidence regarding long-term outcomes is inconclusive.We included patients in linked clinical registry and administrative data undergoing EVAR or OSR for intact AAA between January 2010 and June 2019. We used an inverse probability of treatment-weighted survival analysis to compare all-cause mortality, cause-specific mortality, secondary interventions and secondary rupture, and evaluate the impact of secondary interventions and secondary rupture on all-cause mortality.The study included 3460 EVAR and 427 OSR patients. Compared to OSR, the EVAR all-cause mortality rate was lower in the first 30 days (adjusted hazard ratio [HR]=0.24, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.15-0.36), but higher between 1 and 4 years (HR=1.31, 95% CI 1.14-1.51) and after 4 years (HR=1.45, 95% CI 1.25-1.67). Secondary intervention rates were higher over the first 30 days (HR=2.20, 95% CI 1.09-4.44), but lower between 1 and 4 years (HR=0.60, 95% CI 0.49-0.75). Secondary aortic intervention rates were higher across the entire follow-up period (HR=2.45, 95% CI 2.01-2.99). Secondary rupture rates did not differ significantly (HR=1.15, 95% CI 0.78-1.70). All-cause mortality beyond 1 year remained significantly higher for EVAR after adjusting for any secondary interventions, or secondary rupture.EVAR has an early survival benefit compared to OSR. However, elevated long-term mortality and higher rates of secondary aortic interventions and subsequent aneurysm repair suggest that EVAR may be a less durable method of aortic aneurysm exclusion.