Back to Search Start Over

Conservative, surgical, and percutaneous treatment for mitral regurgitation shortly after acute myocardial infarction

Authors :
Tomás Benito-González
Marianna Adamo
Noé Corpataux
Lion Poles
Yishay Wasserstrum
Danny Dvir
Julio Echarte-Morales
Marco Gennari
Mattia Di Pasquale
Doron Sudarsky
Mony Shuvy
Leor Perl
Salvatore Scianna
Maurizio Taramasso
Paolo Denti
Andrés Íñiguez-Romo
Konstantinos Spargias
Estefanía Fernández-Peregrina
Haim D. Danenberg
Neil Fam
Dabit Arzamendi
Felipe Fernández-Vázquez
Michael Chrissoheris
Pedro A. Villablanca
Fabien Praz
Rodrigo Estévez-Loureiro
Ronen Beeri
Andrew Czarnecki
Xavier Freixa
Davide Schiavi
Carlos E. Vergara-Uzcategui
Arthur Kerner
Isaac Pascual
Claudia Scardino
Igal Moaraf
Berenice Caneiro-Queija
Vlasis Ninios
Lian Krivoshei
Luis Nombela-Franco
Francesco Maisano
Jacob George
Dan Haberman
Ander Regueiro
Source :
European heart journal. 43(7)
Publication Year :
2021

Abstract

Aims Severe mitral regurgitation (MR) following acute myocardial infarction (MI) is associated with high mortality rates and has inconclusive recommendations in clinical guidelines. We aimed to report the international experience of patients with secondary MR following acute MI and compare the outcomes of those treated conservatively, surgically, and percutaneously. Methods and results Retrospective international registry of consecutive patients with at least moderate-to-severe MR following MI treated in 21 centres in North America, Europe, and the Middle East. The registry included patients treated conservatively and those having surgical mitral valve repair or replacement (SMVR) or percutaneous mitral valve repair (PMVR) using edge-to-edge repair. The primary endpoint was in-hospital mortality. A total of 471 patients were included (43% female, age 73 ± 11 years): 205 underwent interventions, of whom 106 were SMVR and 99 PMVR. Patients who underwent mitral valve intervention were in a worse clinical state (Killip class ≥3 in 60% vs. 43%, P < 0.01), but yet had lower in-hospital and 1-year mortality compared with those treated conservatively [11% vs. 27%, P < 0.01 and 16% vs. 35%, P < 0.01; adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 0.28, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.18–0.46, P < 0.01]. Surgical mitral valve repair or replacement was performed earlier than PMVR [median of 12 days from MI date (interquartile range 5–19) vs. 19 days (10–40), P < 0.01]. The immediate procedural success did not differ between SMVR and PMVR (92% vs. 93%, P = 0.53). However, in-hospital and 1-year mortality rates were significantly higher in SMVR than in PMVR (16% vs. 6%, P = 0.03 and 31% vs. 17%, P = 0.04; adjusted HR 3.75, 95% CI 1.55–9.07, P < 0.01). Conclusions Early intervention may mitigate the poor prognosis associated with conservative therapy in patients with post-MI MR. Percutaneous mitral valve repair can serve as an alternative for surgery in reducing MR for high-risk patients.

Details

ISSN :
15229645
Volume :
43
Issue :
7
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
European heart journal
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....6f43a97c583b548da4573a85144644b5