Back to Search Start Over

Comparison of eotaxin-3 biomarker in patients with eosinophilic oesophagitis, proton pump inhibitor-responsive oesophageal eosinophilia and gastro-oesophageal reflux disease

Authors :
Fouad J. Moawad
B. J. Reinhardt
Corinne L. Maydonovitch
Thomas P. Baker
R. L. Johnson
J. M. Wells
Source :
Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics. 42:231-238
Publication Year :
2015
Publisher :
Wiley, 2015.

Abstract

SummaryBackground Proton pump inhibitor-responsive oesophageal eosinophilia (PPI-REE) is a recently described entity which resembles oeosinophilic oesophagitis (EoE), yet responds to acid suppressive treatment. Aim To determine whether EoE shares similar staining features with PPI-REE or with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Methods This retrospective study consisted of patients with an established diagnosis of EoE, PPI-REE, or GERD identified from a database during a 1-year period. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) analysis was performed specifically targeting eotaxin-3 antibodies. All sections were qualitatively (intensity) and quantitatively (percentage of cells stained) assessed independently by two blinded pathologists. Results The cohort consisted of three groups of patients: EoE (n = 22), PPI-REE (n = 23) and GERD (n = 23) for a total of 68 patients. Study demographics included mean age 39 (14) years, 75% male and 77% Caucasian. There was a significant difference in the eotaxin-3 staining among EoE, PPI-REE and GERD groups [mean score (s.d.): 1.2 (1.2), 0.8 (1.0), 0.3 (0.7), P = 0.006]. Staining scores of EoE patients were significantly higher compared with GERD (P = 0.002) and a trend towards significance was seen between EoE and PPI-REE (P = 0.054). There was also a significant difference in EoE staining intensity score among the three groups (P = 0.006). Intensity scores of EoE were significantly higher compared with GERD [1.0 (0.9) vs. 0.22 (0.52), P

Details

ISSN :
02692813
Volume :
42
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....6f130781ee7f5274f9f96558e3f201e3