Back to Search
Start Over
Limited evidence suggests complete arch digital scans are less time efficient than conventional impression
- Source :
- Evidence-based dentistry. 21(4)
- Publication Year :
- 2020
-
Abstract
- Source of funding This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectorsType of study/design Randomised controlled trial (RCT) with parallel design.Subjects This RCT was conducted at the Clinic of Fixed and Removable Prosthodontics and Dental Material Science, Centre of Dental Medicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland. Ten patients, six women and four men, with a mean age of 62 years and an age range of 49-77 years, requiring posterior tooth-supported 3-unit fixed partial dentures (FPDs) were included in this RCT. The abutment teeth were six molars and six premolars in the maxilla and five molars and three premolars in the mandible. The patients fulfilled the following inclusion criteria: they all were >18 years, with a full mouth plaque score
- Subjects :
- Male
Ceramics
Dental Impression Technique
Visual analogue scale
medicine.medical_treatment
Prosthesis
law.invention
Workflow
03 medical and health sciences
0302 clinical medicine
Randomized controlled trial
CEREC
law
Medicine
Humans
030212 general & internal medicine
General Dentistry
Aged
Orthodontics
business.industry
Dental Impression Materials
030206 dentistry
Middle Aged
Impression
Maxilla
Dental impression material
Denture, Partial, Fixed
Female
Zirconium
business
Switzerland
Subjects
Details
- ISSN :
- 14765446
- Volume :
- 21
- Issue :
- 4
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- Evidence-based dentistry
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....6ed736166bfdbed23c9e0b5900a2b0d9