Back to Search Start Over

Point-of-care ultrasound versus radiology department pelvic ultrasound on emergency department length of stay

Authors :
Ariel Aspen
John C. Fox
Craig L. Anderson
Shadi Lahham
Mohammad Subeh
Sean P. Wilson
Alan Chiem
Kiah Connolly
Chanel Fischetti
Source :
Wilson, SP; Connolly, K; Lahham, S; Subeh, M; Fischetti, C; Chiem, A; et al.(2016). Point-of-care ultrasound versus radiology department pelvic ultrasound on emergency department length of stay.. World journal of emergency medicine, 7(3), 178-182. doi: 10.5847/wjem.j.1920-8642.2016.03.003. UC Irvine: Retrieved from: http://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/7s80q74f
Publication Year :
2016

Abstract

Author(s): Wilson, Sean P; Connolly, Kiah; Lahham, Shadi; Subeh, Mohammad; Fischetti, Chanel; Chiem, Alan; Aspen, Ariel; Anderson, Craig; Fox, John C | Abstract: BackgroundThe study aimed to compare the time to overall length of stay (LOS) for patients who underwent point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) versus radiology department ultrasound (RDUS).MethodsThis was a prospective study on a convenience sample of patients who required pelvic ultrasound imaging as part of their emergency department (ED) assessment.ResultsWe enrolled a total of 194 patients who were on average 32 years-old. Ninety-eight (51%) patients were pregnant (l20 weeks). Time to completion of RDUS was 66 minutes longer than POCUS (95%CI 60-73, Pl0.01). Patients randomized to the RDUS arm experienced a 120 minute longer ED length of stay (LOS) (95%CI 66-173, Pl0.01).ConclusionIn patients who require pelvic ultrasound as part of their diagnostic evaluation, POCUS resulted in a significant decrease in time to ultrasound and ED LOS.

Details

ISSN :
19208642
Volume :
7
Issue :
3
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
World journal of emergency medicine
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....6ec4727e1cccd5f2aa183c1b5a4dcfc1
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.5847/wjem.j.1920-8642.2016.03.003.