Back to Search Start Over

Semen Parameters and Conception Rates after Intraperitoneal Insemination

Authors :
Walter Vegetti
Liliane Chatenoud
P. G. Crosignani
L. Perotti
Fabio Parazzini
Guido Ragni
L. De Lauretis
F. Sapienza
Source :
Scopus-Elsevier
Publication Year :
1997
Publisher :
S. Karger AG, 1997.

Abstract

Objective: To analyze the reproductive outcome in infertile couples which underwent intraperitoneal insemination (IPI). Methods: We analyzed a series of 216 couples who underwent IPI. Indications for treatment were unexplained infertility in 51 couples and male factor in 165. The 51 couples with unexplained infertility underwent a total of 71 cycles (20 couples underwent a second IPI cycle). The 165 couples with male factor underwent 243 cycles (165 first cycles and 78 second cycles). Results: Out of the 314 cycles performed, a total of 41 clinical pregnancies were observed, with a corresponding conception rate of 13.1%. The values of conception rates for unexplained and male factor infertility were 21.1 (based on 15 pregnancies) and 10.7% (based on 26 pregnancies), respectively. Out of the 41 pregnant women, 26 gave birth to a child, thus the overall livebirth rate was 8.3% (12.7 and 7.0%, respectively, for unexplained infertility and male factor diagnostic subgroups). Considering the couples with unexplained infertility, the conception rates were 9.0, 30.8 and 20.0% for strata of 10 millions of inseminated spermatozoa. The corresponding values were 6.8, 12.5 and 18.5%, respectively, in couples with male factor infertility (χ21 trend p Conclusion: In conclusion, this series provides quantitative estimates of pregnancy rates after IPI in Italian couples with unexplained infertility or male infertility and suggested that the number of motile sperm inseminated is a determinant of pregnancy with this technique.

Details

ISSN :
1423002X and 03787346
Volume :
44
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Gynecologic and Obstetric Investigation
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....6ea8a2d6a1e53496ec242d8318638a3a
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1159/000291536