Back to Search Start Over

Incidence and Management of Restenosis After Treatment of Unprotected Left Main Disease With Second-Generation Drug-Eluting Stents (from Failure in Left Main Study With 2nd Generation Stents–Cardiogroup III Study)

Authors :
Claudio Moretti
Alaide Chieffo
Maurizio D'Amico
Javier Escaned
Giuseppe Biondi-Zoccai
Giacomo Boccuzzi
Roberto di Summa
Ferdinando Varbella
Fabrizio D'Ascenzo
Fabrizio Ugo
Roberto Garbo
Marco Pavani
Sara Rettegno
Antonio Colombo
Fiorenzo Gaita
Federico Conrotto
Hyroishi Kawamoto
Enrico Cerrato
Antonio Montefusco
Pierluigi Omedè
D'Ascenzo, Fabrizio
Chieffo, Alaide
Cerrato, Enrico
Ugo, Fabrizio
Pavani, Marco
Kawamoto, Hyroishi
Di Summa, Roberto
Varbella, Ferdinando
Boccuzzi, Giacomo
Omedã, Pierluigi
Rettegno, Sara
Garbo, Roberto
Conrotto, Federico
Montefusco, Antonio
Biondi zoccai, Giuseppe
D'Amico, Maurizio
Moretti, Claudio
Escaned, Javier
Gaita, Fiorenzo
Colombo, Antonio
Source :
The American Journal of Cardiology. 119:978-982
Publication Year :
2017
Publisher :
Elsevier BV, 2017.

Abstract

Incidence, predictors, and impact on prognosis of target lesion revascularization (TLR) for patients treated with second-generation drug-eluting stents (DESs) on unprotected left main (ULM) remain to be defined. The present study is a multicenter study including patients treated with a second-generation DES on ULM from June 2007 to January 2015. Rate of TLR was the primary end point. All cause death, myocardial infarction, target vessel revascularization, and stent thrombosis were the secondary end points. A total of 1,270 patients were enrolled: after a follow-up of 650 days (230 to 1,170), 47 (3.7%) of them underwent a re–percutaneous coronary intervention TLR on the left main, 22 during a planned angiographic follow-up. Extent of coronary artery disease was similar among groups (median value of Syntax of 27 ± 10 vs 26 ± 9, p = 0.45), as localization of the lesion in the ULM. Of patients reporting with TLR on ULM, 56% presented with a focal restenosis, 33% diffuse and 10% proliferative. At multivariate analysis, insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus increased risk of TLR (hazard ratio [HR] 2.0: 1.1 to 3.6, p = 0.04), whereas use of intravascular ultrasound resulted protective (HR 0.5: 0.3 to 0.9, p = 0.02). At follow-up, rates of cardiovascular death did not differ among the 2 groups (4% vs 4%, p = 0.95). At multivariate analysis, TLR on LM did not increase risk of all cause death (HR 0.4: 0.1 to 1.6, p = 0.22), whereas cardiogenic shock and III tertile of Syntax portended a worse prognosis (HR 4.5: 2.1 to 10.2, p = 0.01 and HR 1.4: 1.1 to 1.6, p = 0.03, respectively). In conclusion, repeated revascularization after implantation of second-generation DES on ULM represents an unfrequent event, being increased in insulin-dependent patients and reduced by intravascular ultrasound. Impact on prognosis remains neutral, being related to clinical presentation and extent of coronary artery disease.

Details

ISSN :
00029149
Volume :
119
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
The American Journal of Cardiology
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....6d9027b2258ffeafed63372fc49be417
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2016.12.005