Initial experience with an innovative pilot program evaluating a multidisciplinary approach to supportive care planning in a survivorship clinic setting

242 Background: The supportive care and rehabilitative needs of cancer patients are highly varied and complex, and optimal care planning often requires the provision and coordination of multiple modalities. To address these needs, an innovative model for multi-disciplinary evaluation and management within a survivorship clinic was piloted. Methods: Between November 2013 and May 2014, 50 patients who had completed cancer therapy with curative intent were seen in a multi-disciplinary survivorship clinic (MDSC) sequentially by an advanced practice practitioner (nurse practitioner or physician assistant), oncology social worker, and oncology rehabilitation therapist. Data regarding specific care planning resulting from this encounter, compliance with recommended therapies, and patient-reported satisfaction were collected. These data were compared against the remaining cohort of patients (N = 402) who completed curative intent cancer therapy in our cancer program during the same period. Results: Rate of referral for rehabilitation services (83.3% vs 13.9%, p < 0.01) and compliance with recommended therapy visits (85.7% vs 44.6%, p < 0.01) were significantly increased among patients seen within the MDSC pilot when compared with similar patients who were not seen in this setting. The number of referred therapy modalities was also increased among patients seen in the MDSC pilot, median 2 (range 1-3 modalities) vs 1 (range 1-2 modalities), respectively. Of patients who completed an assessment following the multi-disciplinary visit, 86% scored their overall experience as excellent which was the highest possible score. Conclusions: Patients seen within an innovative pilot program of multi-disciplinary survivorship care planning appreciated increased rates of referral for rehabilitation services, were referred for a greater number of therapy modalities, and were more compliant with recommended interventions than similar patients who were not seen in this setting. This patient cohort also reported high rates of satisfaction with the pilot program.