Back to Search Start Over

Patient satisfaction after multiple revision surgeries for adult spinal deformity

Authors :
Wesley M. Durand
Alan H. Daniels
Kevin DiSilvestro
Renaud Lafage
Bassel G. Diebo
Peter G. Passias
Han Jo Kim
Themistocles Protopsaltis
Virginie Lafage
Justin S. Smith
Christopher I. Shaffrey
Munish C. Gupta
Eric O. Klineberg
Frank Schwab
Jeffrey L. Gum
Gregory M. Mundis
Robert K. Eastlack
Khaled Kebaish
Alex Soroceanu
Richard A. Hostin
Douglas Burton
Shay Bess
Christopher P. Ames
Robert A. Hart
D. Kojo Hamilton
Source :
Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine. 38:75-83
Publication Year :
2023
Publisher :
Journal of Neurosurgery Publishing Group (JNSPG), 2023.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE Revision surgery is often necessary for adult spinal deformity (ASD) patients. Satisfaction with management is an important component of health-related quality of life. The authors hypothesized that patients who underwent multiple revision surgeries following ASD correction would exhibit lower self-reported satisfaction scores. METHODS This was a retrospective cohort study of 668 patients who underwent ASD surgery and were eligible for a minimum 2-year follow-up. Visits were stratified by occurrence prior to the index surgery (period 0), after the index surgery only (period 1), after the first revision only (period 2), and after the second revision only (period 3). Patients were further stratified by prior spine surgery before their index surgery. Scoliosis Research Society–22 (SRS-22r) health-related quality-of-life satisfaction subscore and total satisfaction scores were evaluated at all periods using multiple linear regression and adjustment for age, sex, and Charlson Comorbidity Index. RESULTS In total, 46.6% of the study patients had undergone prior spine surgery before their index surgery. The overall revision rate was 21.3%. Among patients with no spine surgery prior to the index surgery, SRS-22r satisfaction scores increased from period 0 to 1 (from 2.8 to 4.3, p < 0.0001), decreased after one revision from period 1 to 2 (4.3 to 3.9, p = 0.0004), and decreased further after a second revision from period 2 to 3 (3.9 to 3.3, p = 0.0437). Among patients with spine surgery prior to the index procedure, SRS-22r satisfaction increased from period 0 to 1 (2.8 to 4.2, p < 0.0001) and decreased from period 1 to 2 (4.2 to 3.8, p = 0.0011). No differences in follow-up time from last surgery were observed (all p > 0.3). Among patients with multiple revisions, 40% experienced rod fracture, 40% proximal junctional kyphosis, and 33% pseudarthrosis. CONCLUSIONS Among patients undergoing ASD surgery, revision surgery is associated with decreased satisfaction, and multiple revisions are associated with additive detriment to satisfaction among patients initially undergoing primary surgery. These findings have direct implications for preoperative patient counseling and establishment of postoperative expectations.

Subjects

Subjects :
General Medicine

Details

ISSN :
15475654
Volume :
38
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....6cbe5b299a9a24f3173eaa5ea243d6b7