Back to Search Start Over

Lightweight Interactive Proving inside an Automatic Program Verifier

Authors :
Sylvain Dailler
Yannick Moy
Claude Marché
Formally Verified Programs, Certified Tools and Numerical Computations (TOCCATA)
Laboratoire de Recherche en Informatique (LRI)
Université Paris-Sud - Paris 11 (UP11)-CentraleSupélec-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Université Paris-Sud - Paris 11 (UP11)-CentraleSupélec-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Inria Saclay - Ile de France
Institut National de Recherche en Informatique et en Automatique (Inria)-Institut National de Recherche en Informatique et en Automatique (Inria)
AdaCore (FRANCE)
Masci, Paolo
Monahan, Rosemary
Prevosto, Virgile
Source :
4th Workshop on Formal Integrated Development Environment, 4th Workshop on Formal Integrated Development Environment, 2018, Oxford, United Kingdom, F-IDE@FLoC, HAL, Electronic Proceedings in Theoretical Computer Science, Vol 284, Iss Proc. F-IDE 2018, Pp 1-15 (2018)
Publication Year :
2018
Publisher :
HAL CCSD, 2018.

Abstract

Among formal methods, the deductive verification approach allows establishing the strongest possible formal guarantees on critical software. The downside is the cost in terms of human effort required to design adequate formal specifications and to successfully discharge the required proof obligations. To popularize deductive verification in an industrial software development environment, it is essential to provide means to progressively transition from simple and automated approaches to deductive verification. The SPARK environment, for development of critical software written in Ada, goes towards this goal by providing automated tools for formally proving that some code fulfills the requirements expressed in Ada contracts. In a program verifier that makes use of automatic provers to discharge the proof obligations, a need for some additional user interaction with proof tasks shows up: either to help analyzing the reason of a proof failure or, ultimately, to discharge the verification conditions that are out-of-reach of state-of-the-art automatic provers. Adding interactive proof features in SPARK appears to be complicated by the fact that the proof toolchain makes use of the independent, intermediate verification tool Why3, which is generic enough to accept multiple front-ends for different input languages. This paper reports on our approach to extend Why3 with interactive proof features and also with a generic client-server infrastructure allowing integration of proof interaction into an external, front-end graphical user interface such as the one of SPARK.<br />In Proceedings F-IDE 2018, arXiv:1811.09014

Details

Language :
English
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
4th Workshop on Formal Integrated Development Environment, 4th Workshop on Formal Integrated Development Environment, 2018, Oxford, United Kingdom, F-IDE@FLoC, HAL, Electronic Proceedings in Theoretical Computer Science, Vol 284, Iss Proc. F-IDE 2018, Pp 1-15 (2018)
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....6c8414d74676c018049a52d86c4691cb