Back to Search Start Over

Saline nasal irrigation for acute upper respiratory tract infections in infants and children: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Authors :
Aurélie Cabaillot
Bruno Pereirad
Mathieu Roca
Bénédicte Eschalier
Rémy Boussageon
Philippe Vorilhon
Neuro-Dol (Neuro-Dol)
Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM)-Université Clermont Auvergne [2017-2020] (UCA [2017-2020])
Unité de Biostatistiques [CHU Clermont-Ferrand]
Direction de la recherche clinique et de l’innovation [CHU Clermont-Ferrand] (DRCI)
CHU Clermont-Ferrand-CHU Clermont-Ferrand
AutomédiCation aCcompagnement Pluriprofessionnel PatienT (ACCePPT)
Université Clermont Auvergne [2017-2020] (UCA [2017-2020])
Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM)-Université Clermont Auvergne (UCA)
Faculté de Médecine - Clermont-Auvergne (FM - UCA)
Université Clermont Auvergne (UCA)
Institut Pascal (IP)
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Université Clermont Auvergne (UCA)-Institut national polytechnique Clermont Auvergne (INP Clermont Auvergne)
Université Clermont Auvergne (UCA)-Université Clermont Auvergne (UCA)
Université de Poitiers - Faculté de Médecine et de Pharmacie
Université de Poitiers
CCSD, Accord Elsevier
Source :
Paediatric Respiratory Reviews, Paediatric Respiratory Reviews, Elsevier, 2020, 36, pp.151-158. ⟨10.1016/j.prrv.2019.11.003⟩, Paediatric Respiratory Reviews, 2020, 36, pp.151-158. ⟨10.1016/j.prrv.2019.11.003⟩
Publication Year :
2019

Abstract

International audience; Purpose: Acute upper respiratory tract infections are the most common infections in infants and children. Saline nasal irrigation (SNI) is widely prescribed and recommended. We conducted a systematic review to assess the efficacy and safety of SNI in infants and children with acute rhinopharyngitis.Methods: We searched CENTRAL, Medline, Embase and clinicalTrials.gov. Two authors selected randomized control trials (RCTs), including infants ≥3 months and children ≤12 years, comparing the use of isotonic saline solutions, whatever their mode of administration, with one therapeutic abstention, or a therapy deemed less important for nasal lavage. Trial quality was assessed independently by two authors, who, with a third author, extracted and analysed data. Statistical analysis was conducted using Comprehensive Meta-Analysis software. The standard difference in means (SMD) between groups and its 95% confidence interval were estimated.Results: Four RCTs (569 participants) were included. The analysis showed a benefit of SNI for certain clinical rhinological symptoms (SMD = -0.29 [-0.45; -0.13]) but no significant improvement of respiratory symptoms (SMD = -0.19 [-0.70; 1.08]) or health status (SMD = -0.30 [-0.68; 0.07]). Its use appeared to limit the prescription of other treatments, whether local or systemic, and particularly antibiotics. Long-term use led to a decrease in the incidence of acute rhinosinusitis and its complications. SNI appeared to be a safe treatment.Conclusions: SNI is beneficial for rhinological symptoms but not respiratory symptoms. Further research is needed to address the full benefits/risks of this treatment.

Details

ISSN :
15260550 and 15260542
Volume :
36
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Paediatric respiratory reviews
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....6c4b92cc8ad8de3b5203d9ee24d8078e
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prrv.2019.11.003⟩